Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by twojciac View Post
Reread my post, reread the Federalist papers and Anti-Federalist papers, reread the Constitution, and get back to us. The general welfare clause is NOT about granting the federal government ANY unenumerated powers. The 9th and 10th Amendments are very clear on this.

The President is paid for a job. We can debate how much that job is worth, but it would be foolish to believe that the salary given is a handout.
The feds have the power to coin money. They also have the power to hand out that money in ANY way that they desire.

For what our President does, even the non-monetary compensation is way too much. However, I submit that EVERY government worker is a welfare recipient...and every soldier too. Our money goes to pay THOSE wages, so how is that any different than welfare?

You know, if they'd just pay a LIVING wage to all able bodied men (women should not work outside the home), they wouldn't NEED welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:14 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
For what our President does, even the non-monetary compensation is way too much. However, I submit that EVERY government worker is a welfare recipient...and every soldier too. Our money goes to pay THOSE wages, so how is that any different than welfare?
You seriously dont see the difference between someone who goes to work providing a service to collect a paycheck, and someone who collects welfare, and thereby receives a check for not providing a service?

If not, please seek either a dictionary, or therapy..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You seriously dont see the difference between someone who goes to work providing a service to collect a paycheck, and someone who collects welfare, and thereby receives a check for not providing a service?

If not, please seek either a dictionary, or therapy..
What "service" do they provide?

It's only of "service" if *I* find it valuable. Take, for instance, TV and movie actors, or sports figures. No interest from me, so why should they get paid large salaries?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder
31,304 posts, read 32,883,423 times
Reputation: 84477
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
saying it includes more than welfare alone. It does include more than Aid to Families with Dependent Children, now known (hopefully) as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF); it also includes food stamps; Medicaid; the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); utilities assistance under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP); housing assistance under a variety of programs, including public housing and Section 8 Rental Assistance; and the free commodities program
I’m in favor of cutting programs but I’d like to start with the right ones first. Let’s start with corporate welfare and that would include the payouts, kickbacks, and exceptions on taxes for the corporate, business and wealthy Americans and companies first. One of the items they are talking about in Washington today is the tax exemption for the OIL industry with their billions of dollars profit and yet they are exempt!

Then lets take those meds from the sick and unhealthy Americans. Next grab the sandwich and food from that kid in school that’s too poor to eat at home and the school meal is the only one he gets that day.

And the tax write offs for the wealthy because they used their private plane to fly on a business/ vacation trip is another good spot to clean up. Or the cost of docking their yacht in Hawaii while on a trip of business and pleasure.

But first let’s take out our oily rag and cleanup the Oil industry tax rip-offs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
..and every soldier too. Our money goes to pay THOSE wages, so how is that any different than welfare?

That is crap! Our brave men and women in uniform are bravely serving theirs, an your, country. They WORK for a small pittance - something you might have difficulty understanding.

They put their lives on the line each and everyday - AND, as a parent of someone who is getting shot at every day - you, yes YOU should show some RESPECT for those in uniform!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:24 AM
 
3,255 posts, read 5,080,037 times
Reputation: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
You know, if they'd just pay a LIVING wage to all able bodied men (women should not work outside the home), they wouldn't NEED welfare.

Now there is a concept. If half the population stopped working altogether, we would create a huge labor shortage, drive wages through the roof and no government regulation would be needed. I don't care who makes up the half. But if we banded together and created a labor shortage seems we would be doing everyone a big favor! Think of the gains in individual productivity figures! If the moved the jobs out of the country, we would not have any money for us to buy their products anyway.

The point is there a system, we pay for people to be reasonably healthy and educated to fill the jobs to earn the money to buy the products. If a substantial portion of your population opts out of consumerism, the economy fails, so even if you like the idea of starving and cold families, the economies of our cities rely on the money the spend and something would have to replace it and as we have planned unemployment in this country, it cannot be always jobs. Welfare is cyclical also, getting people through the lay off periods etc, but they do not really want the workers moving away, because the work will be back.

BTW I have not had anyone explain the charity system that can deal with all the issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:25 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
What "service" do they provide?

It's only of "service" if *I* find it valuable. Take, for instance, TV and movie actors, or sports figures. No interest from me, so why should they get paid large salaries?
Are you serious, or you just posting for the sake of posting?
What service does the military provide?
What service does those who go to work at the government provide? (other then processing paperwork for socialistic programs)

As for tv and movie actors, sports figures, you are not forced to pay them, or forced to support them.. nor do they collect welfare by stealing your money.. off topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
You know, if they'd just pay a LIVING wage to all able bodied men (women should not work outside the home), they wouldn't NEED welfare.
And why pray tell do you say this????

I look forward to your response
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Are you serious, or you just posting for the sake of posting?
What service does the military provide?
What service does those who go to work at the government provide? (other then processing paperwork for socialistic programs)

As for tv and movie actors, sports figures, you are not forced to pay them, or forced to support them.. nor do they collect welfare by stealing your money.. off topic.
I served in the Navy...I considered my paycheck a "handout". Not only did I get FREE medical care, FREE food, FREE housing...I also got PAID. But did I actually provide a SERVICE, or was my life filled with "busy work", on standby, in case we were actually NEEDED to defend the country, instead of serving our country's political foreign policy?

For your second question, I echo what you say...what DO they do for us? Except trample on our liberties by passing or enforcing rules and regulations?

And the third, even though I personally don't support them, why is their income so much greater than the norm? Is their "service" really THAT valuable? I don't see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 10:32 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by AksarbeN View Post
I’m in favor of cutting programs but I’d like to start with the right ones first. Let’s start with corporate welfare and that would include the payouts, kickbacks, and exceptions on taxes for the corporate, business and wealthy Americans and companies first. One of the items they are talking about in Washington today is the tax exemption for the OIL industry with their billions of dollars profit and yet they are exempt!

Then lets take those meds from the sick and unhealthy Americans. Next grab the sandwich and food from that kid in school that’s too poor to eat at home and the school meal is the only one he gets that day.

And the tax write offs for the wealthy because they used their private plane to fly on a business/ vacation trip is another good spot to clean up. Or the cost of docking their yacht in Hawaii while on a trip of business and pleasure.

But first let’s take out our oily rag and cleanup the Oil industry tax rip-offs.
I'm all for stopping corporate welfare to, but the examples you provided are not corporate welfare.. The Oil industry is far from exempt.. Where did you get that hogwash from?

People collect $100.00 and after taxes they are left with $67.00 on average
Oil companies collect $100 are left with $9.20 on average

Add into that, when that $9.20 goes to the stock holders, it gets further taxed, meaning that about $6 is left.

Add to that, the federal government collects about $.50 per gallon of gas in taxes and one can clearly see by doing the math, that the Oil companies are far from "welfare" status.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top