Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-18-2018, 07:08 PM
 
25,441 posts, read 9,800,380 times
Reputation: 15333

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria View Post
Oh, do you have a link to an article or something about this? I wanna see.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ms/1023068002/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/17/u...-infowars.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b018b93e93c64e
https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/17/med...uit/index.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8497176.html
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...e-sandy-hook-/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...m-says-n901811
https://globalnews.ca/news/4395453/a...sacre-lawsuit/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...-case-57249705
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2018, 08:06 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,854,747 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria View Post
Oh, do you have a link to an article or something about this? I wanna see.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alex-jo...famation-case/
No surprise that Fox isn't one of the major news outlets that carried the story...
Which means it is likely true...

So this is alleged
Not proven yet
But if it is then he has really shot himself in the foot
And since he is such a coward, it seems likely he would attempt to cover his tracks...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 08:09 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,854,747 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by herenow1 View Post
Youtube is not owned by the public. It is owned by shareholders. It has a right to censor anyone it wants to. It is their platform. If you don't like it, don't use it. People acting like Youtube is a right protected by the Constitution.
YouTube is owned by Google isn't it?
Predominately, I mean...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,729,935 times
Reputation: 38634
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
YouTube is owned by Google isn't it?
Predominately, I mean...
Google is not a public business, it is a private business. I'm getting really sick and tired of listening to those on the right, (and I'm on the right), on here and on social media pi$$ing and whining about this. If you don't agree to the TOS of the private company, go find another platform.

If you don't like or trust any other platform, create your own.

As someone said in the swim cap thread, the person who sees the problem and creates something better is usually the person who ends up with a spit ton of cash when all is said and done.

On this one, the left is absolutely correct: The right looks like a bunch of sniveling little snowflakes on this matter. It's fricken embarrassing.

You (general) do not have the "right" to use Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. It's NOT a right. You use the platforms for free, you are not paying for them. It's NOT a right. Therefore, these platforms are not violating any of your rights.

I've seen way too many on the right demanding that the government control a business because their fee-fees got hurt. That's what the left typically does, and yet here we are with the left saying, "It's a private business" and the right saying, "but my feewings! Government! FIX THIS" like that unhinged girl in the video after Hillary lost.

If you don't agree that government should have been involved with the cake baker, then you shouldn't be saying the government should be involved in this.

Monopoly schmonopoly. CREATE YOUR OWN if you don't like the way things are going! GD! What is wrong with you all? Instead of getting up and doing something - using creativity and ingenuity, you all (general) are sitting there with your thumbs in your mouths sobbing as if you had NO OTHER CHOICE.

Those on the right who are asking for the government to step in are wrong, wrong, wrong!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,822,859 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Apple iTunes, Spotify, Facebook - BANNED.

Ban, ban, ban...coming again from the left. Because that's where it always comes from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 08:48 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,854,747 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
Google is not a public business, it is a private business. I'm getting really sick and tired of listening to those on the right, (and I'm on the right), on here and on social media pi$$ing and whining about this. If you don't agree to the TOS of the private company, go find another platform.

If you don't like or trust any other platform, create your own.

As someone said in the swim cap thread, the person who sees the problem and creates something better is usually the person who ends up with a spit ton of cash when all is said and done.

On this one, the left is absolutely correct: The right looks like a bunch of sniveling little snowflakes on this matter. It's fricken embarrassing.

You (general) do not have the "right" to use Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. It's NOT a right. You use the platforms for free, you are not paying for them. It's NOT a right. Therefore, these platforms are not violating any of your rights.

I've seen way too many on the right demanding that the government control a business because their fee-fees got hurt. That's what the left typically does, and yet here we are with the left saying, "It's a private business" and the right saying, "but my feewings! Government! FIX THIS" like that unhinged girl in the video after Hillary lost.

If you don't agree that government should have been involved with the cake baker, then you shouldn't be saying the government should be involved in this.

Monopoly schmonopoly. CREATE YOUR OWN if you don't like the way things are going! GD! What is wrong with you all? Instead of getting up and doing something - using creativity and ingenuity, you all (general) are sitting there with your thumbs in your mouths sobbing as if you had NO OTHER CHOICE.

Those on the right who are asking for the government to step in are wrong, wrong, wrong!
You need to chill

I really was just asking a POINT OF INFO question...

I am not complaining about anything seen on YouTube or rights to free speech

You are going full-bore to me and I have not followed ANY of this thread really
Totally wasted your time and finger dexterity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2018, 07:11 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Jones has apparently destroyed evidence in the case of being sued by Sandy Hook parents
I think his life and future have gotten diametrically darker if that is proven...





What evidence would that be?
Evidence that would clear his name?


LOL! Twitter.
You would think the smart lawyers for the Sandy Hook Parents would have grabbed them, well before anyone had a chance to scrub any tweets, that twitter has back up to what was posted and what was deleted,.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2018, 07:13 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by herenow1 View Post
Youtube is not owned by the public. It is owned by shareholders. It has a right to censor anyone it wants to. It is their platform. If you don't like it, don't use it. People acting like Youtube is a right protected by the Constitution.



As an open public communications platform, it is held under the restrictions of CDA 230.




https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2018, 07:18 AM
TKO
 
Location: On the Border
4,153 posts, read 4,277,004 times
Reputation: 3287
C'mon, you guys made up your own news networks where you can live in a fantasy news land of racist unicorns that eat coal and poop foreign policy wins, why can't you make up your own social media too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2018, 07:20 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8nTzfTyvtk&t=3108s




Seems the collusion thing in a concerted effort, is the Anti-Trust lawsuit on the horizon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top