Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, I am very confused about your point. What hell do you speak of? The hell of unaffordable housing? That occurs in San Francisco, not middle America.
You may be able to understand my point if you stop imagining things I've never said.
So now suddenly you mention unaffordable housing when I've never even touched on it in previous thread with you. The things you accused me of saying is so far off the mark, it's pointless to proceed any further.
If this is fair, San Francisco should be allowed to bill the red states who keep sending their people to camp on our streets...............................
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p
.............I never once raised the fact that other states are bussing their homeless to CA. Not once. Yes, they're doing that to some degree but....
THE MAJORITY OF HOMELESS CAME HERE ON THEIR OWN FREE WILL.
Did I make the point clear?............
Lol.
You contradict yourself over and over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p
CA sends rich people to red states. Red states send poor people to CA. This means CA has to take care of red states' problem children and this is not fair.
.
Yes, California people of means have been escaping California for quite a while now, mostly due to the excessive regulation and the sky rocketing COL. They often bring their regressive ideas with them, such as to Arizona. You need to keep them there. Arizona doesnt want them.
Last edited by snebarekim; 08-26-2018 at 10:17 AM..
You know, I would totally clean up the crappy streets of San Francisco for $185,000. I'd just do it for a year, and with that money use it to get the hell out of this state. Commute isn't that far.
The salary is $71760. This is the money that goes to your pocket. The rest of the fund (roughly $110000) goes to benefits, whick does not go to your pocket directly. Health benefit is good only if you go see doctors or get medication, vacation/holidays time don't convert to cash, retirement fund is no use until you reach retirement age and have been working for the city for a defined number of years(20?).
If it just stops at that, which I'm sure it will, treating a symptom and ignoring the cause. It's not her money, it's the taxpayers money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
