Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wall Street Journal: The outside sex crimes prosecutor that the Republicans hired yesterday to interrogate Dr. Ford, Rachel Mitchell, advised Republicans yesterday in mid-hearing that to continue questioning Kavanaugh, she was required by her oath in Arizona to inform Kavanaugh of his rights after he lied to her about the July 1, 1982 entry on his calendar. Something about Maryland statutes was the last question she asked, then a break was called. Mitchell never asked another question.
92 votes. For 49/fewer category---moving up but likely not the winning vote unless some GOP Senators get calls from their wives and daughters...
Collins will vote YES---
And face a huge war chest of that funding for someone to run against her....
Murkowski seems more on the fence
Flake flakes like he always does--another Rand Paul
Some of these senators are going to get backlash when they run--if they run
Hatch and Grassley better pack it up
They showed they have a difficult time even reading the material placed in front of them--dodos past their extinction date
Booker is kind of cracking me up trying to "prove" her case. What he's saying is corroboration is not, in fact, corroboration. Knowing who someone is - not corroboration. Knowing who their friends are, people they consistently hung out with at that time - not corroboration. Knowing Judge worked at Safeway in high school - not corroboration. Having a purported witness say she did not know and had never met Kavanaugh with or without Ford - that's corroboration but......for Kavanaugh.
Don't you love how he keeps talking about "her truth"? Hey, Booker! There is no such thing as "HER truth"; there is only THE truth. Either Kavanaugh did what she alleged, or he did not. Facts are not subjective. She can believe whatever she wants, but her beliefs are not coated in truth dust, merely because her story serves your interest.
So you agree Broderick could have been telling the truth?
We'll never know now. It's really hard to reconcile her different versions of the story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1
And that it is possible she signed an Affidavit under duress because she was intimidated by powerful WHITE MEN? Do you?
Sure, it's possible. It's how many men typically react to women who report sexual abuse. Look at Kavanaugh. He's pretty much saying Ford is lying, even though everyone who watched her testimony has said she is credible.
We are in a different age now than we were 30 years ago. The age of old white men having complete control is coming to an end. And the world will be better for it.
This IS a payback for what GOP has done in recent history
what goes around comes around......
yep, yep, yep....
Unfortunate for Kavanaugh, that he lost his cool yesterday and went full partisan, so there is no doubt he would be an activist judge at the highest court.
the dems took SCOTUS nominating process into the toilet with Bork and Thomas, and now this. Sorry, but the dems chickens came home to roost with Garland.
These past two weeks has been the dems breeding even more chickens. And they will cry if these chickens ever come home to roost.
Nice try - but while you're at it why don't you ask the 40+ guys she slept with before the age of 21.
Typical tactic
Smear the woman
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
