Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not convinced.
You re all over the map .
Tell me, names of prominent women that are saying its a political stunt? Women don't make something like this up.
And men know it.
Women keep it quiet out of shame. For years to forever.
Only the healthy healed brave ones speak up.
There is no statute of limitations on murder.
Sexual assault murders a womans soul.
Women never make a false claim of rape/sexual assault? Ever? lol, now I have heard it all.
Since when do female voters and “men of conscience” not believe in due process?
And why do they never talk about all the men of conscience who are probably now going to vote for the GOP because of this? You know, senators telling men to just shut up and saying all women must be believed is a terrifying prospect. It means that anyone can be subjected to this and have their careers and reputations ruined over an allegation. No proof necessary because if you question a woman’s veracity then you’re a misogynist.
They want the same outrageous standards for criminal matters as they do at college campuses these days. It’s unconstitutional. And ALL men should be concerned about this, and women of conscience.
Not convinced.
You re all over the map .
Tell me, names of prominent women that are saying its a political stunt?
Women don't make something like this up.
And men know it.
It's hard to believe you're serious. Women and men make all kinds of things up. And what the hell do "prominent women" have to do with this?
She's doing everything she can to undermine her credibility.
So send the FBI to investigate if you are so sure...
I would be all for it if there was a single bit of supporting evidence, however, there is none. I do not believe in holding up processes like this over an accusation with no supporting evidence. I do not think anything, even a job cleaning toilets, should be held up over accusations with zero evidence to support.
There was opinion piece in the WaPo a day or so ago suggesting that a classmate of Kavanaugh who resembled him might have been the real assaulted of Ford and she confused this "look alike" for Kavanaugh. Now two guys who are friends of Kavanaugh are taking that Hail-Mary pass and trying to run a defence for him...one is named Ed Wheland--was former clerk for Judge Scalia and has been helping prep Kavanaugh for these hearings and he is friend of Kavanaugh to boot as well as close friend of Leonard Le, the head of the Federalist Society who constructed the list Trump used to choose his pick for the Supreme Court...
Wheland even put out a blueprint of a house where it might have happened and a photo/name of a classmate of Kavanaugh's as the guy they think is the one who probably assaulted Ford and she just confused him with Kananaugh because Kavanaugh was so well know at Georgetown Prep
The only problem is that Ford answered that canard and said she knew both the boys (now men) at that time, socialized with them--and she would never confuse the two...
So she definitively dismisses that deflection by Wheland...
Now this guy who went to school with Kavanaugh---has been Suggested as the likely sexual assaulted of Dr. Ford instead of Kavanaugh--
He apparently is a middle school teacher--likely his name is making the rounds of all the alt-right conspiracy websites and he will be getting all kinds of hate mail threatening him to confess to this crime and get Kavanaugh off...
That seems to be a libelous action on the part of Wheland to defame an innocent man...
Do you have links to the article naming this other assailant as well as the article where Dr. Ford says it wasn't him?
No----a guy who wasn't there, but is a friend of Kavanaugh's, with a vested interest in having him approved takes an idea fronted in a WaPo opinion piece w/o any factual basis or first-hand experience--and suggests someone who is a real person, who was a classmate of Kavanaugh's (how do you think he go THAT name), likely whom Wheland has never even met, and throws that guy's name out as the REAL guy in that room assaulting Dr. Ford...
Whereas Ford WAS in that room, knows BOTH men and definitively says that Kavanaugh was the guy trying to ripe her clothes off and rape her...
Not two peas in a pod at all...
But seems like Kavanaugh has friends who are certainly willing to lie for him and defame other men just to protect Brett's chance at being SCOTUS---and what do you want to bet that Kavanaugh maybe provided the name of the guy who most resembled him in Georgetown Prep...so not only did he try to rape Dr. Ford but now he is maybe screwing over a fellow classmate--
There must be a LOT riding on seeing Brett sit on that bench
I would be all for it if there was a single bit of supporting evidence, however, there is none. I do not believe in holding up processes like this over an accusation with no supporting evidence. I do not think anything, even a job cleaning toilets, should be held up over accusations with zero evidence to support.
There s evidence. It s around ...
After it participated in egging on the attacker, and jumping on the bed to help hold her down...it wrote a letter to the Senate Committee saying ...
...He did not wish to participate...in the consequences.
Assault is assault.
Only the perpetrators give it an expiration date.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
