Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Much of what we now know about the unethical and often illegal behavior of the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency and Department of Justice emerged due to the efforts of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Its chairman during its stunning disclosures has been Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who in turn has been constantly demonized for his efforts.
Much of what we now know about the unethical and often illegal behavior of the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency and Department of Justice emerged due to the efforts of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Its chairman during its stunning disclosures has been Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who in turn has been constantly demonized for his efforts.
Mueller can't do anything unless he taints the coming election.
While the documents are in the process of being released. Voters will have the most up-date information going into the election.
Poor old Mueller has to suck his thumb while his corrupted investigation is exposed.
Actually there is something stopping him.....from making public anything on anyone up for re-election in the next couple months. But of note-this is a guideline, not a law. He CAN in fact do so if warranted. Plus this covers ONLY those up for re-election. Anyone outside of that is fair game.
So Nunes is probably safe from Mueller for example for a couple months. But only probably.
Much of what we now know about the unethical and often illegal behavior of the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency and Department of Justice emerged due to the efforts of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Its chairman during its stunning disclosures has been Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who in turn has been constantly demonized for his efforts.
Still no explanation of what effect "exposing Bruce Ohr" could have on the Mueller investigation.
Actually there is something stopping him.....from making public anything on anyone up for re-election in the next couple months. But of note-this is a guideline, not a law. He CAN in fact do so if warranted. Plus this covers ONLY those up for re-election. Anyone outside of that is fair game.
So Nunes is probably safe from Mueller for example for a couple months. But only probably.
Sound like an admission he is targeting people looking for a crime. The witch hunter inquisitor.
Wikileaks is just a source for leaking information, and much of the information leaked is not B.S as you put it.
30,000 searchable Clinton emails are accesible if you go the site, and there were leaks regarding confidential information from numerous sources over the years including Edward Snowden and others.
As for Cambridge Analytica, Mueller has already interviewed a number of individuals and then you have the information provided by western intelligence agencies and others, and now you have information coming from an ever increasing number of informants, many of whom had a close working relationship with Trump.
Ya know, I owe you an apology. I was in a haze when I wrote that and transposed WikiPEDIA with WikiLEAKS. My bad, I will now go genuflect and stand for my flogging...
Republican Congress members who questioned Bruce Ohr behind closed doors Tuesday learned the former top Justice Department official had regular contact in 2016 with Andrew Weissmann – who is now Robert Mueller’s top deputy – regarding the dubious, anti-Trump dossier of unverified claims that became a major premise for launching the special counsel investigation.
There is now growing confidence that the FBI’s sudden pivot from Papadopoulos to Steele was driven by several individuals, all with serious political baggage.
For starters, why did the FBI allow Ohr to participate in the Steele matter when there was a known conflict with his wife’s employment? And did they ever disclose that conflict to the court?
Why did the FBI fail to fully disclose to the court that Steele was being paid by Democrats to help defeat Trump, or that Steele himself was desperate to stop Trump?
Did agents misrepresent “hearsay” evidence as corroborated intelligence?
Going on the third week now and it's still going strong. I'm starting to think that the OP may have been a little overzealous in his initial assessment?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
