Are you familiar with the famous "nattering nabobs of negativism"?

[jimj]

Originally Posted by Clarallel

In theory, any bashing at a funeral is depressing. It just shows you how a president unmoored from all norms of traditional behavior now has the general population action outside our norms as well.

But I guess you think that it's specifically entertainers who don't have the right to bash presidents? By the way, are you even-handed enough to fault the president when he bashes entertainers? Do you speak up to say that it's in poor taste for him to insult Kaepernick and Streep?

Your TDS has you talking in senseless circles... What funeral are you talking about for one???

[r small]

Originally Posted by Tonyafd

Spiro Agnew, the Rodney Dangerfield of politics. He gave good headache.

I remember Speero T. Agnew. The most corrupt governor in Maryland's history. I wouldn't compare him to Rodney Dangerfield though. Everyone in America that liked to laugh loved Rodney. Not many people liked Agnew. When he was forced to resign as VP no one shed a tear. It was good riddance to bad rubbish.

[craigiri]

Originally Posted by jimj

Well that explains why Obama and Candidate Hillary avoided the press as much as possible. Some of the LEAST transparent people yet...

Also, some of the most investigated.....you can be certain that Obama has got to be the cleanest POL on the current scene (who held higher office).....

Transparent or not...that's different from actually being a crooks. It's possible to certainly mix transparency with "national security" and come up with answers that mean it's best to keep some things quiet.

But Obama is no Nixon...or Agnew. In the scheme of history (already figured in), he's a Great Man compared to those two.

[jimj]

Originally Posted by craigiri

Also, some of the most investigated.....you can be certain that Obama has got to be the cleanest POL on the current scene (who held higher office).....

Transparent or not...that's different from actually being a crooks. It's possible to certainly mix transparency with "national security" and come up with answers that mean it's best to keep some things quiet.

But Obama is no Nixon...or Agnew. In the scheme of history (already figured in), he's a Great Man compared to those two.

As compared to Nixon/Agnew you may have a point.
As for Obama being clean? Depends where the FBI/DOJ questions about the fake info dossier and it's backers goes, if it was a setup of Trump, who was involved, who colluded (if anyone) and how high it went if it turns out heads of the agencies were/are involved.
So far it's looking a bit like a setup might have happened and that it goes up to at least to the second in charge of the FBI/DOJ.
Too early to tell who else if anyone...

[rupp-certified]

Originally Posted by mohawkx

Probably because Trump has sucked all the oxygen out of the nation. He's made it all about him. Everything is all about Trump. When I sit on the can, it's all about Trump. Every news program is all about Trump. Every event in America is all about Trump. Every social site is all about trump. Every form of social communication is all about Trump.

...

Why are you surprised?

I'm not surprised, I'm entertained