Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Demonic's are all over the place on rape.....they support rape if it's a Dem political figure or person of a political persuasion or race they favor and they are up in arms if it's a conservative even if there is zero proof other than the accusation is patently false.
If you hate the hypocrisy then you are definitely not a Republican.
The blindly partisan, whether R or D all do this. I'll ask any Republican if they were just fine with Bill Clinton lying under oath? I've yet to hear anyone say no, but Kavanaugh lying, no problem, confirm him today!
That doesn't matter. Plenty of judges have been insulted and even personally threatened in criminal cases. They are expected to maintain their temperament throughout.
Keep on with the absurd. It only makes the Democrats look worse. Because the sentiment I keep hearing about his anger from normal people is "Well, can you blame him?"
He IS a human and frankly, I buy absolutely nothing you or the Democrats are selling with this line because if he had remained calm, you would have called him a robot, or lacks empathy, or whatever they made up. So yeah, I'm calling a full loud BS on this crappy temperament argument.
Unfortunately, they don't have a vote. Trust me, 3 million extra people couldn't get Hillary elected as President. Republicans have stuck their neck out for Kavanaugh. WE're in scorched earth mode. Outside of him standing in the middle of Manhattan and shooting someone ala Trump, he will have enough votes to be confirmed.
Recall people saying that Clarence Thomas shouldn't be an SC justice and look what happened.
Elections have consequences, my friend. We wouldn't be talking about Kavanaugh if the Dems were smart enough to outwit the Republicans last election. And here we are.
When people use the "judicial temperament" talking point they are telling you they are not very bright and not worth taking seriously.
Precisely. Or they are trying to hide their obvious bias and blame it on something else. Why won't they just come out and say it - that they're Democrats and oppose him because he's a conservative. Period. That's the truth and they keep trying to pretend otherwise. What utter BS.
The left is now overboard and doesn’t even take Bill Clinton, Weinstein etc as serious rapist/abusers.
Years of abuse is tolerated by the left and now the left wants good people to be convicted based on lies.
The biggest losers are the accused/innocent and the real victims of abuse
Riiiiggghhhhtttt and it just so happens those professors are liberals too.
Really? When did they disclose their political leanings? Please, if you have some inside information, share.
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel
This isn't his first time on the bench. It's quite easy to look back at his career as a jurist to determine his temperament on the bench.
But this is the first time we've ever seen him under pressure of being interrogated. And he didn't handle it well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I will amend my original statement.
