Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Very funny. Women are capable of logic, and of understanding the law and how it works. Yet Dems are insisting that tears and emotion overrules complete lack of corroboration and evidence.
No. What we learned when Trump was elected was that millions of women are cool with sexual assault. If Kavanaugh would have been rejected Alabama`s Roy Moore was waiting in the wings.
No. What we learned when Trump was elected was that millions of women are cool with sexual assault. If Kavanaugh would have been rejected Alabama`s Roy Moore was waiting in the wings.
You set that bar when you elected Bill and tried to elect Hillary. Liberals are such complete hypocrites.
I'm going to keep posting the same thing. Kavanaugh was not a defendant in a criminal trial. Lack of evidence or not, the innocent until proven guilty standard did not apply. It was a job interview. What did apply was the fact that the Republicans wanted to appoint him and the interview and investigation was directed and orchestrated by a group of Republicans. Hence the fact that he was confirmed along party lines. So continue reading opinion pieces about the confirmation and gloating but it does not change the fact that the innocent until guilty standard did not apply, so your repeated claim that the lack of evidence was the reason he was confirmed anyway is flawed and illogical. The Republicans were determined to appoint him come hell or high water.
That's just ridiculous! We are not North Korea, LOl
So, if i falsely accuse a woman of sexually harassing me at work, I should automatically be believed and the harasser fired immediately, because it's not a criminal trial? get real! Lmao
Very funny. Women are capable of logic, and of understanding the law and how it works. Yet Dems are insisting that tears and emotion overrules complete lack of corroboration and evidence.
Yes and is a very dangerous precedent they are setting. If a man can be accused of an alleged sex crime that happened over 30 years ago where there are no witnesses no evidence and where the woman that was allegedly attacked has a vague recollection of the where and when plus in the case of Kavanaugh a clear political agenda to be gained then a man can be accused and destroyed over just about anything.
There are clear cut cases of sexual abuse like when a child molester is caught red handed or in the case of Harvey where it was well known that he was a pervert and even jokes were made about him manipulating women to his shower but a sketchy story of he said she said from 36 years ago is Nonsense.
The evidence in any case needs to be examined carefully but as we have seen from the Left and the NYT before they make excuses and let emotions rule the day.
There is no doubt that the Left hopes that this wave of emotion from the Kavanaugh mess will carry over to the elections in a few weeks and that people will believe once again that the Republicans HATE women.
I hope no one here has the misfortune of having to work with this woman.
So when is she going to be fired? Does she represent Microsoft and what Microsoft thinks? Clearly Microsoft must agree if she isn't fired, that's the stance liberals take when a conservative tweets.
You set that bar when you elected Bill and tried to elect Hillary. Liberals are such complete hypocrites.
Here's a big news flash for conservatives ~ plenty of today's democrats never ONCE voted for Bill Clinton.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.