Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
how can anyone decide guilt or innocence of the shop owner or the thief based on a few second video clip that shows nothing that happened before the shooting? some are very quick to jump to conclusions.
1. "agricultural laborer" - not saying that they're illegal, but that sounds like double speak for "illegal".
.
The right won't commit to any type of immigration reform but continues to allow the status quo where necessary immigrant labor is used to keep the US agriculture industry going, but said immigrants are used as boogeyman to rile up their base at elections.
It really is perplexing, and sad. Maybe non hypocritical right wingers will only consume agricultural foodstuffs they grow themselves or procure from other citizens. Not holding my breath though
He was not threatened, he murdered someone for shoplifting. Of course you are glad he was murdered, gun humpers look for any reason to shoot someone, and that's exactly what he did.
776.031 Use or threatened use of force in defense of property.—
(1) A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
776.08 Forcible felony.—“Forcible felony” means treason; murder; manslaughter; sexual battery; carjacking; home-invasion robbery; robbery; burglary; arson; kidnapping; aggravated assault; aggravated battery; aggravated stalking; aircraft piracy; unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual.
And people like you who ignore racism that still exists in this country are even worse
racism still exists, and bigotry still exists, or some people wouldn't assume who was in the wrong or right based on a short clip and the skin color of the people involved.
not every crime involving a white person and a black/brown person is based on racism. I doubt most crimes involving white people and black/brown people are based on racism.
Last edited by texan2yankee; 10-20-2018 at 01:23 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
