Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's clear that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, because I didn't vote for Obama.
Got anything else? Or do you want to continue to go back and forth with me as I prove you wrong time and time again
I didn't ask if you voted for Obama or not.
I asked, where were you, when the Imperial President Obama, destroyed what this nation is all about, slow walking Communism into the fabric?
Hillary Clinton is right. We cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what America stands for. She’s right that we must fight against politicians and activists who degrade the rule of law, seek to delegitimize our elections, spread corruption, attack truth and reason, and try to undermine our national unity. A defiant, defensive, and dystopian political party must be met with determined aggression, not niceties. But she’s living in upside-down world if she believes that’s the Republican Party.
can't rep you again, but I agree with you on this one 100 % I was about to post the same thing, but you worded it better.
Hillary Clinton is right. We cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what America stands for. She’s right that we must fight against politicians and activists who degrade the rule of law, seek to delegitimize our elections, spread corruption, attack truth and reason, and try to undermine our national unity. A defiant, defensive, and dystopian political party must be met with determined aggression, not niceties. But she’s living in upside-down world if she believes that’s the Republican Party.
The democrats' strategy is so completely wrong, and Hillary is just complicating matters. The way to win over the hearts and minds of voters is not by attacking and belittling them, but by coming up with a platform to run on that is genuinely attractive. You make friends with people by being nice to them... not exactly rocket science here.
Evidently, democrats haven't figured that out though, so instead they continue with their campaign of fear mongering, race baiting, character assassination, and endless propaganda, and think somehow more people will be on board with that.
Maybe it is democrats, that were never told the truth, for a reason.... To keep the ignorant, ignorant.
In 2013 the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent the University of Montana a letter that became a national “blueprint” for tackling sexual and racial harassment. The letter urged a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and requires complaints to be heard in quasi-judicial procedures that deny legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based on a mere “more likely than not” standard.
As noted civil libertarian Harvey Silverglate explained this week, the administration construed Title IX—the federal law barring sex discrimination by federally funded schools—as a mandate to punish students and faculty accused of sexual misconduct using procedures that make it extraordinarily difficult for innocent people to defend themselves.
Colleges were barring speakers who they didn't want on campus long before 2013. Epic fail!
It is freedom of speech for an institution to not invite somebody they don't want on their campus. If the University of Montana doesn't want David Duke to make a speech on their campus, they have the right to do so.
You are wrong: Donald Trump and his wing (the alt-right) of the republican party are working to destroy everything America stands for.
and tells how you know this? Give us some examples. So he wants to keep out those who attempt to come to our country illegally, what is wrong with that? If they were fleeting a war it might be different, but they are fleeing countries that may not have as much as we do, but they need to do it legally. Why should we welcome them knowing that they will soon be living off our government? And yes, some are criminals? If you do not think so, you are living on another planet.
I didn't ask if you voted for Obama or not.
I asked, where were you, when the Imperial President Obama, destroyed what this nation is all about, slow walking Communism into the fabric?
"...slow walking Communism into the fabric". Talk about hyperbole.
Colleges were barring speakers who they didn't want on campus long before 2013. Epic fail!
It is freedom of speech for an institution to not invite somebody they don't want on their campus. If the University of Montana doesn't want David Duke to make a speech on their campus, they have the right to do so.
Examples?
David Duke wasn't going to speak in Montana.
So, I take you were unaware of the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, were involved so deeply.
Also, that letter was about sexual assault and harassment, NOT political speech. Geeze you are daft!
No. As it was worded... “unwelcome” speech
With a broad brush, or "Safe Spaces" & Free Speech Zones" would not be a thing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.