Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 05:54 AM
 
58,958 posts, read 27,261,820 times
Reputation: 14265

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
No. You forgot that he's probably an alcoholic.
You can tell by the face.

"You forgot that he's probably an alcoholic."


So, if I made an accusation that YOU are a child molester, EVERYBODY should believe me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:05 AM
 
16,536 posts, read 8,579,208 times
Reputation: 19373
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
As it does to the right, such as refusing to investigate the credible claim of Kavanaugh's college roommate that Kavanaugh lied under oath to Congress.

When Clinton lied under oath to Congress they impeached him.

When Kavanugh was accused of lying under oath to Congress, instead of investigating, they gave him a lifetime job.

Bunch of dam hypocrites.


What a horrible example.

As you stated, Clinton actually lied under oath.
That is a far cry from someone accusing another of lying.
As we can see how fanatics accused Kavanaugh of drugging and raping them, is it not hard to imagine someone with political or personal animus toward Kavanaugh falsely accusing him? The Republicans tolerated the freak show put on by paid kooks, and the Democrats themselves, to delay and obstruct the hearing.
If it were up to them (and presumably you) they would still be investigating hoping to find some way of keeping him off the court, right?

Funny how you or others cannot point to a single time the Republicans have ever pulled such stunts against super liberal judges like Ginsburg and vote based on qualifications (96-3). Yet the Democrats have pulled such freak shows against at least 3 scotus nominees, trying to destroy them starting with judge Robert Bork.

`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:05 AM
 
4,861 posts, read 9,303,613 times
Reputation: 7762
The lady who owned the barn where we used to board a horse had a ruddier complexion than Brett Kavanaugh. She never touched alcohol, she had a medical condition called rosacea.

Does the person who called him an alcoholic have documented evidence that he doesn't have a medical condition similar to this or that he drinks in excess?

Didn't think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:09 AM
 
20,321 posts, read 19,905,966 times
Reputation: 13436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eumaois View Post
I wonder how SJW liberal feminists would explain this.
Either ignore, deflect or deny. It's all they have.

Oh wait, "fake news".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:21 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,535 posts, read 2,855,128 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
If not having the right temperment was a criteria to be on the SC, then Ruth Ginsburg with her diatribes and verbal attacks on the POTUS should be removed from her post.
You will have to wake her passed out drunk a$$ up first.
She is a wino, she admitted to drinking wine one night so according to the Dem play book that makes her a alcoholic .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:41 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
If she's lying she should be prosecuted. And no, he should not have been confirmed. Had nothing to do with this woman telling the truth or not. He just doesn't have the temperament.
You mean because he lashed out at the women falsely accusing him of a horrible crime? Or because you disagree with his politics?

What exactly about his temperament prohibited him from being on the bench?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:42 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,439,195 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
You mean because he lashed out at the women falsely accusing him of a horrible crime? Or because you disagree with his politics?

What exactly about his temperament prohibited him from being on the bench?
He defended himself and didn't roll over to the lies and smears. That's why they think he isn't fit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:42 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northman83 View Post
Kavanaugh lied repeatedly under oath, yelled at people when caught in lies, WH withheld 80% of everything he did while he worked in the Whitehouse ( like approving torture ).. NOT SC material.
Libs keep repeating this, but it still isn't true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:44 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayarea4 View Post
This. Just because one woman jumped on the bandwagon and falsely claimed rape, doesn't mean that Justice Kavanaugh is innocent of all charges, and there were many. The way the White House curtailed the hearings and silenced witnesses - not to mention Kavanaugh's own questionable statements and inappropriate displays of emotion during the process - strongly suggests to me that Kavanaugh should not have been confirmed.
Actually, Kavanaugh IS innocent of all charges, as he's not been proven guilty. Which is what happens in this country, thankfully. And this liar is the perfect example of why that is.

PS - those "inappropriate" displays of emotion were in response to the lies being told by these disgusting women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 06:46 AM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,602 posts, read 6,890,573 times
Reputation: 16500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
You mean because he lashed out at the women falsely accusing him of a horrible crime? Or because you disagree with his politics?

What exactly about his temperament prohibited him from being on the bench?
It was his twelve years on the D.C. appellate court writing opinions that were based on the constitution instead of a left wing agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top