Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So the logic is -- the corrupt Broward officials chose to let him vote because they thought he would vote Democratic. When they found he listed as Republican on his voter registration, you would think they wouldn't have let him vote if they had a choice.
But by law those folks awaiting trial have not yet lost their right to vote. It's the law. It isn't a Democratic thing or a Republican thing...it's a law.
Are we not for abiding by the laws of the country?
How dare you bring the LAW and truth into this attack thread against Democrats.
Its always funny to see the democrats be selective about the laws they want to obey and no problem ignoring the ones they don't.
They act like the constitution is a buffet.
I'll have a little of that and some this but I don't want any of that. Do you want a second plate ? Oh no, I don't want any second amendment either.
That one over there looks nice. I'll have some of it.
To be fair... both sides do this much to my dismay. That said, yes, it's very eye-rolling to see people be selective about which laws they want to obey and then turn around and act like passing more laws are going to accomplish anything (I'm obviously referencing more gun laws).
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron
Innocent until proven otherwise, therefore able to vote.
Yes, it makes me feel annoyed too...
Hardly falls under the #MeToo crowd's worries...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.