Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:07 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open-D View Post
The issue is bigger than Acosta, bigger than press conferences. It involves the very structure of our government, and the checks and balances imposed by 3 CO-EQUAL branches of government.

The courts, however, on their own, and wholly without Constitutional mandate or authority, have taken it upon themselves to be a super-branch, over and above both the legislative, executive branches, as well as the work product (laws) passed by their combined efforts.

It MUST stop.

The administration MUST issue a Temporary Restraining Order quashing the Court's TRO. Simply, put, no court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this issue, nor the authority to trump the actions of another branch.

Quash the courts TRO and keep the troll out of the White House - forever.

Except for the fact that the court's ruling will ultimately be to the benefit of Trump in giving him the legal basis to maintain iron-clad control over press conferences, I'd like to see him defy the court and declare the judicial branch has no legal jurisdiction over how the executive branch conducts it's business on it's property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:11 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
It's a trap. If he goes back to his old ways, nobody would support him. Let's see if the courts rule that Trump must give him a question.

It would go back to the DC judge that has already stated in his ruling that Trump did not have to take questions from him. The only way the judge could rule otherwise now would be to say that he got it wrong the first time, and most judges would rather jump from the Golden Gate bridge than admit they were wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,957 posts, read 75,183,468 times
Reputation: 66917
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinaTwo View Post
No matter his personal thoughts about the President , respect the office. Plus he was hindering other journalists from doing their assignments.
You mean like Trump respected him when he called Acosta all sorts of names? Uh-huh ...

Secondly, he did not hinder anyone from doing their jobs. Other reporters in the room were able to ask questions during that press conference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
That is like saying John Wilkes Booth, must have access to the Whitehouse, Mr. Lincoln.
It's like saying no such thing. Try to follow along.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
If he has a "right" to be there, so does 300+ million people.
Wrong again!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
It is a privilege to be given. Not just anyone can waltz into the WH.
So ... wait. In one breath, you say 300+ million people have a right to be there, and in the next you say not just anyone can waltz into the White House.

Make up your mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
CNN wasn't banned - only one disruptive person - and the president / WH should have a right to do that.
The White House must apply its standards equally to all reporters, and follow protocol and due process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open-D View Post
The courts, however, on their own, and wholly without Constitutional mandate or authority, have taken it upon themselves to be a super-branch, over and above both the legislative, executive branches, as well as the work product (laws) passed by their combined efforts.
Perhaps you're confused about the purpose of the courts, which is to provide checks and balances on the other two branches of the government. At times, that requires going "over and above" the other two branches. It's kinda been that way since ... 1801, I believe.

Quote:
Quash the courts TRO and keep the troll out of the White House - forever.
This kind of bullcrap is exactly what the courts are authorized to prevent - unfairly applying laws, rules and regulations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacInTx View Post
The press room did not exist before ... President Nixon.
You'd be quite wrong about that. The White House has had a dedicated press room since the late 19th century.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Whi...se-press-corps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post


The White House must apply its standards equally to all reporters, and follow protocol and due process.
And what exactly are those standards, protocol and due process?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,221,735 times
Reputation: 3925
It's pathetic that a kindergarten classroom is more civil than the press corp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,221,735 times
Reputation: 3925
Jim is gonna whine like a baby when Trump doesn't call on him
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:31 PM
 
2,068 posts, read 998,988 times
Reputation: 3641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
You'd be quite wrong about that. The White House has had a dedicated press room since the late 19th century.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Whi...se-press-corps


Per Wikipedia...
"The first presidential press conference was held on 15 March 1913 in the Oval Office, during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. Subsequently, through to 1969, communications from the President and general press news conferences took place in various locations, including the Indian Treaty Room, the State Department auditorium, and the White House East Room.[1] In 1969, to accommodate the growing number of reporters assigned to the White House, President Richard Nixon had the indoor swimming pool, which had been installed by the March of Dimes for Franklin D. Roosevelt, covered and turned into press offices and a lounge that could double as a briefing room."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Madison, Alabama
12,971 posts, read 9,495,132 times
Reputation: 8957
Acosta is a total jerk. Can you imagine the backlash from CNN if anyone had treated Obama the same way? CNN is no longer a news organization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:36 PM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,576,536 times
Reputation: 14393
Sarah Sanders and the President should totally ignore Accosted and keep the camera off of him.

I'd like to see other reporters being able to ask questions. They used to do that early on in this administration, even having people on big screens from across the country. The non elite media asked far more relevant, substantive questions about real issues than the tabloid presstititutes and their gotcha nonsense and grandstanding.

Who gets to decide who gets a question answered? Anyone know? I wonder if it has to do with unions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2018, 07:49 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open-D View Post
The issue is bigger than Acosta, bigger than press conferences. It involves the very structure of our government, and the checks and balances imposed by 3 CO-EQUAL branches of government.

The courts, however, on their own, and wholly without Constitutional mandate or authority, have taken it upon themselves to be a super-branch, over and above both the legislative, executive branches, as well as the work product (laws) passed by their combined efforts.

It MUST stop.

The administration MUST issue a Temporary Restraining Order quashing the Court's TRO. Simply, put, no court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this issue, nor the authority to trump the actions of another branch.

Quash the courts TRO and keep the troll out of the White House - forever.
You would think CNN is the 4th Branch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top