Obama Appointed Judge Blocks Trumps Asylum Rules; Allows Migrants To Enter Illegally And Claim Asylum (revolution, illegal immigration)

[PilgrimsProgress]

This is why it's so important that Repubs control the Senate. They can continue getting more conservative judges.

[atltechdude]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

Why is DACA a "harder" case? Can you elaborate?


There is no law under INA of 1952 Title 8 states that illegal immigrants came here as children can deferred deportation and allow work permits in US.

DACA is an administrative deferment of prosecution.

Prosecutorial discretion applies to all laws.

[atltechdude]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

This is why it's so important that Repubs control the Senate. They can continue getting more conservative judges.

So following the law doesn't matter? The judge should just issue whatever ruling is conservative?

[Tinawina]

Originally Posted by Dbones

Again, letting people come here illegally isn't following the law. It's the judge who is allowing law breaking. He will be ignored.

It is for asslyum seekers.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

This is why it's so important that Repubs control the Senate. They can continue getting more conservative judges.

Do you think that these great textualists will rule against the constitution relative to Asylum.


Several states challenged DACA and it was in the Texas court this past summer and the judge dismissed their case. Judge Andrew Hanen was appointed by GW Bush, conservative enough for you.


https://www.npr.org/2018/08/31/64381...es-it-in-place

[TEPLimey]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

This is why it's so important that Repubs control the Senate. They can continue getting more conservative judges.

What you seem to be suggesting is that a Conservative judge is less likely to follow the law than this particular judge because he or she would seek to yield an anti-immigration result. There is a name for that and it is "judicial activism".

We can add it to the list of things Trump's GOP no longer stands for:
non-activist judges
fiscal responsibility
free trade
transparency
small government
Federalism
reduced budget deficits
morality
science
global leadership

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by atltechdude

DACA is an administrative deferment of prosecution.

Prosecutorial discretion applies to all laws.

can you elaborate that a little bit more?


Better yet, can you give me a link to whatever you just copy & paste?

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress

This is why it's so important that Repubs control the Senate. They can continue getting more conservative judges.

You mean 'conservative' judges would allow Republican presidents to create law

There is nothing conservative in such thing.

You are saying you need the Senate to appoint partisan activist judges.

[LuminousTruth]

Originally Posted by Jimmyp25

Already knew this was going to happen. It seemed like the new asylum rules actually were helping. Now our borders are going to be flooded with illegals AGAIN!!!


https://thehill.com/latino/417552-ju...g-us-illegally

Oh no, not again. I was really oppressed and endangered by the illegal minorities seeking asylum through government registration last time.

How dense can these people get?

[Donna-501]

Originally Posted by Dbones

Just ignore the illegal ruling, they can't do anything about it anyway.

But in his ruling Monday, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar agreed with legal groups that immediately sued, arguing that U.S. immigration law clearly allows someone to seek asylum even if they enter the country between official ports of entry.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/legal-gro...193608107.html