Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I can't wait for all the information to come out and read the responses from the nothingburger crowd. Their excuses will be epic, I may need to take the day off.
I really want President Drain the Swamp to pardon this felon Manafort, that will only help the obstruction case against him.
I can't wait for all the information to come out and read the responses from the nothingburger crowd. Their excuses will be epic, I may need to take the day off.
I really want President Drain the Swamp to pardon this felon Manafort, that will only help the obstruction case against him.
Now how stupid is this. A pardon is obstruction now. You legal scholars missed your boat.
I can't wait for all the information to come out and read the responses from the nothingburger crowd. Their excuses will be epic, I may need to take the day off.
I really want President Drain the Swamp to pardon this felon Manafort, that will only help the obstruction case against him.
lol Greenwald is knocking the crap out of this garbage story.
lol Greenwald is knock the crap out of this garbage story.
Greenwald is just ranting about things without any real basis. He accuses people of prematurely concluding that The Guardian story is accurate, but then builds his entire argument on the premature conclusion that it is, in fact, fake.
Of course, the logical position is to consider both sides without immediately dismissing or accepting The Guardian's claims. On one hand, The Guardian claims to have numerous "well-placed" sources and to have seen an Ecuadorian intelligence document confirming it. On the other, Manafort and Wikileaks (self-servingly) deny they met. And while The Guardian claims that they were told Manafort did not log in, the absence of his name in the log certainly cuts against the story. However, Mueller's investigation of the Manafort-Ecuador and the Stone/Corsi-Assange connections lends credence to it. There seem to be some holes on both sides from what is publicly known.
What I will say is that I agree with some of the points in the Politico article. As I noted yesterday, The Guardian's claim that there is a close link between Assange and Manafort through the Ecuadorian embassy seems to have sparked a fire under Russian trolls who seem particularly motivated to discredit it. This suggests to me that there is probably something there, whether or not The Guardian story is 100% accurate or not. We will have to wait and see. Fortunately for us, Mueller has apparently been looking into this for over a year and will (hopefully) have an opportunity to lay his evidence bare. Heck, it might even come tomorrow in the form of the Manafort memorandum that is due.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
