Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't believe or disbelieve her. I have no opinion of her accusations. That being said, having accusations of that type, by that many women, may not mean you are guilty of a crime it can disqualify you from a job. I would no more hire a man with those accusations to be a babysitter in my home than I would allow him to become a supreme court justice.
If you were hiring for a job, and one candidate had multiple accusations and another had none, would you pick him for a sensitive life time job?
What a great can of worms that would open up. Let’s hope we don’t adopt liberals standards
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713
We must believe all women right? Surely all of you who condemned Brett Kavanaugh with literally no corroborating evidence, for actions that he supposedly engaged in during high school will want to be at the front of the line to condemn Neil DeGrasse Tyson for sexual assault. Well, here is your chance.
And there is corroborating evidence in this case. And, go figure, the Democrat left mass media is apparently choosing to largely not cover this story. Is anyone surprised? Hopefully not.
The bias of the mass media is most clearly demonstrated by what the choose NOT to cover and what they basically ignore. This is at the core of the reason why these people should not be blindly trusted.
Anyway, this guys should have his life ruined now, right? I am especially interested in what the "believers" of the accusations against Brett Kavanaugh have to say about these incidents.
And just WHAT is the Republican right mass media saying about it? Or would you rather not look at both sides of the coin?
Wait, what? You did not advocate any waiting or due process for Brett Kavanaugh.
So, what is the rationale for the different treatment for Tyson here, despite the fact that there is corroborating evidence in this case, and there was no corroborating evidence to support ANY of the Kavanaugh accusations?
Tyson is not having a job interview. Kavanaugh was. The fact that the *iinvestigation* did not interview the people who were there at the time does not mean there was no evidence, it just means that there was a coverup because the political bigwigs wanted it.
There was no reason to give Kavanaugh a job on the supreme court given the allegations.
The allegations against DeGrasse Tyson should certainly be covered regardless of his status.
What was demonstrated during the Kavanaugh hearings is that there is literally no lie that Democrat leftists will not tell and no smear or slander campaign that is too despicable or grotesque for them to engage in towards people who they regard as their political adversaries.
People saw this and it was the worst episode of naked character assassination of a political nominee that anyone here has ever seen in this country. I cannot imagine how it could ever be topped. I certainly cannot imagine that any of us will ever see anything worse than this during our lifetimes.
But when someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson gets called out - WITH corroborating evidence - then the excuse making and the waffling begins by many of the very same people who were out to ruin Kavanaugh, WITHOUT any corroborating evidence.
Tyson is not having a job interview. Kavanaugh was. The fact that the *iinvestigation* did not interview the people who were there at the time does not mean there was no evidence, it just means that there was a coverup because the political bigwigs wanted it.
There was no reason to give Kavanaugh a job on the supreme court given the allegations.
The allegations against DeGrasse Tyson should certainly be covered regardless of his status.
What "job interview" includes allegations of gang rape?
There was no reason to give Kavanaugh a job on the supreme court given the allegations.
Allegations are just allegations. I can make an allegation against you right now. If anything, they need to be investigated, but for allegations 30 years prior, I say they serve no relevance. It's almost scary you think his conduct as a horny freshman in college has any bearing on him on the USSC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
