LMAO...watch as Fox News hosts come perilously close to the truth! 😂

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by WaldoKitty

Real "economist". It's a pseudo science. i.e. Nonsense.

Who should he pick? Paul Krugman? The idiot who completely missed the 2008/09 meltdown and who said that the stock market would crash completely should Trump be elected. Just because he has a nobel pryze like Obama, doesn't mean anything at all.



"Economists" get paid to say whatever the one paying wants them to say. Nothing more. There is absolutely no scientific method at work.

Well - it doesn't actually HAVE to be someone you see on tv. Someone should alert Trump.

[tripleh]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

Fox Hosts Chuck Payne, Brian Kilmeade and Stu Varney in 3 separate clips, woke up to the fact that Supply Side Economics and the Trump tax cuts aren’t working. Payne goes so far as to say that capitalism in this country isn’t working properly, and his worst fear is that people will realize it and vote in people that won’t tolerate all of the wealth going to a tiny few Americans.

didnt know you watched Fox, but the more perspectives you get away from the fake news CNN/MSNBC... the better off you will be.

[odanny]

Originally Posted by don1945

Haha, yeah, even FOX NEWS is starting to realize they are supporting a fool and they are starting to suffer because of that support. We have seen a lot of cracks in the wall from Fox lately, and I bet the Trumpees who sat in front of their TV's to get the usual Fox propaganda are wondering what happened....."Ethel, I think them Liberals has done taken over our Fox News !"

When Fox News starts to see the light, you KNOW things are bad !

The truth is, Fox was never on Trump's side during the primary battles, as they have always been a mouthpiece for the Republican Party, and Trump barged in and started saying things that were not the same as every other Republican running. Once they realized his popularity they, of course, get behind him, but Fox would throw him under the bus in a New York second if he falls out of favor with the party.

Plus, it lends credibility to a propaganda outlet like Fox if they "disagree" with a Republican, and they may be taking this approach to dispel the accurate characterization of this network as 'fake news'.