Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Angela Merkel: Trump Has Almost Destroyed The ‘New World Order’
"German chancellor Angela Merkel has admitted that the New World Order is ‘under threat’ due to the rise of President Trump and the trend of Trump-supporting populist leaders winning elections around the world in the past year.
The German leader slammed the rejection of open borders and globalism, and poured scorn on the patriotic movement currently sweeping across Europe, the U.S, Brazil, Australia and other parts of the world."
Why the heck is Germany for one world order----wasn't Hitler for one world order with him the supreme ruler? It's a dangerous concept to begin with easy for manipulation.
The term "new world order" has been used to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the ideological notion of global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve.
Angela Merkel: Trump Has Almost Destroyed The ‘New World Order’
"German chancellor Angela Merkel has admitted that the New World Order is ‘under threat’ due to the rise of President Trump and the trend of Trump-supporting populist leaders winning elections around the world in the past year.
The German leader slammed the rejection of open borders and globalism, and poured scorn on the patriotic movement currently sweeping across Europe, the U.S, Brazil, Australia and other parts of the world."
Why the heck is Germany for one world order----wasn't Hitler for one world order with him the supreme ruler? It's a dangerous concept to begin with easy for manipulation.
People are unhappy with local gov't yet they support a globalist agenda (New World Order - one world gov't). Poor people in the U.S. are living the good life comparatively to the worlds poor and they don't realize that when globalist talk about their concern for the poor, they are referring to the world poor.
Yes, words are powerful because if used correctly everyone can perceive the meaning of the words to mean what they want.
You do realize that Germany's military is in shambles -- perhaps one of the least prepared, least combat-ready, and most poorly run militaries in the western world.
So yeah, you're welcome Germany, for the rest of NATO (primarily the US) contributing more to shared defense so that you guys can have your lavish public programs.
Germany doesn’t need military might and they have no cause to place an emphasis on military contingencies. They aren’t going to war with anyone. They mind their business, and unlike your country, they don’t pick fights and go around the world looking for wars to participate in. To boot, unlike your country, they don’t create false flags, look for weak pretexts, or try to menace their populace with an endless series of imagined enemies. They spend money on the betterment of their society, infrastructure, Heath care, child care, clean energy, education, job training, etc. You know...things that your country takes money FROM to blow on dumb military expenditures.
Angela Merkel: Trump Has Almost Destroyed The ‘New World Order’
"German chancellor Angela Merkel has admitted that the New World Order is ‘under threat’ due to the rise of President Trump and the trend of Trump-supporting populist leaders winning elections around the world in the past year.
The German leader slammed the rejection of open borders and globalism, and poured scorn on the patriotic movement currently sweeping across Europe, the U.S, Brazil, Australia and other parts of the world."
Why the heck is Germany for one world order----wasn't Hitler for one world order with him the supreme ruler? It's a dangerous concept to begin with easy for manipulation.
No matter how much money people have, it's never enough. It's about power and money. Read Revelations, the New World Order has only been delayed. Democrats and swamp republicans will get their way eventually.
Angela Merkel: Trump Has Almost Destroyed The ‘New World Order’
"German chancellor Angela Merkel has admitted that the New World Order is ‘under threat’ due to the rise of President Trump and the trend of Trump-supporting populist leaders winning elections around the world in the past year.
The German leader slammed the rejection of open borders and globalism, and poured scorn on the patriotic movement currently sweeping across Europe, the U.S, Brazil, Australia and other parts of the world."
Why the heck is Germany for one world order----wasn't Hitler for one world order with him the supreme ruler? It's a dangerous concept to begin with easy for manipulation.
“We will fundamentally change America”
-- Obama
Did Obama supporters ask what Obama meant? or did they just assume what he meant? I perceived it to mean that his job was to bring the U.S. closer to a One World government. What did you believe he meant?
Yes, words are powerful because people can attach different meanings to the same words. That's where rhetoric comes in, to lead you to believe what they want you to believe the words mean. It's not the truth that matters, it's what's perceived to be the truth that matters.
Not going to lie, I find it a little spooky when political elites officially use the term 'new world order'. Sounds very 1984-ish.
Bush said it in US, but obviously it all depends on what people mean when they say it. The "new world order" meaning one world government is a conspiracy theory, and as of today there is zero evidence the world has been moving in that direction.
Here's Obama promoting Macron of France, announcing his support for Macron and noting that Macron has "stood up for liberal values".
It has not worked out well. Macron won, liberals voted in favor of their values and then were horrified to discover the cost of their naivete. So they rioted. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...8&&FORM=VRDGAR
Here's Obama promoting Macron of France, announcing his support for Macron and noting that Macron has "stood up for liberal values".
It has not worked out well. Macron won, liberals voted in favor of their values and then were horrified to discover the cost of their naivete. So they rioted. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...8&&FORM=VRDGAR
LOL. Macron is the most pro-business president France has had in decades. He cut welfare benefits and reduced the power of unions, so its not surprising people protest/riot.
LOL. Macron is the most pro-business president France has had in decades. He cut welfare benefits and reduced the power of unions, so its not surprising people protest/riot.
They are rioting over the fuel tax.
Nice try.
Quote:
and they've been marching in the streets and rioting in Paris and elsewhere, protesting yet another bunch of taxes on gasoline in the government's never-ending battle against global warming.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
