Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-13-2018, 04:15 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
I mean, the issue is not really up for debate anymore. Trump ran his campaign on building the Wall, and that is why he got elected.

So, why are Democrats trying to oppose Trump on this?
He campaigned on a free wall, one which is paid by Mexico, but now he is threatening to shut down the government unless the American taxpayer pays for it. Why not collect voluntary contributions from those who actually want a wall?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2018, 04:48 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,669 posts, read 14,631,326 times
Reputation: 15379
He won because he fooled just enough people in the Great Lakes states into believing he’d bring back manufacturing jobs, which of course hasn’t happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 05:01 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
He won because he fooled just enough people in the Great Lakes states into believing he’d bring back manufacturing jobs, which of course hasn’t happened.
You mean the same states that Hillary either 1) thought were in the bag or 2) never even visited - like Wisconsin. Those states, right? At least Trump worked to win them and is trying to help with the economy. Hillary got exactly what she deserved -- a crushing and narrow loss, directly attributable to her own incompetence and arrogance. And I pray that the democrats nominate her again in 2020.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 05:06 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,109,464 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
I mean, the issue is not really up for debate anymore. Trump ran his campaign on building the Wall, and that is why he got elected.

So, why are Democrats trying to oppose Trump on this?
Lol... I hope that's not true. How much do you have to hate "Mexicans" that you'll put up with all of Trump's shenanigans and failure just so he can build a wall that's not going to do anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 05:08 AM
 
4,149 posts, read 3,901,995 times
Reputation: 10938
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Hard for you to be this wrong in such a short writeup.

Quite simply, Trump won because of two things:
1. He was a better choice than Hillary Rodham Clinton
2. He was a chance to vote for an anti establishment candidate for the first time ever. A chance to finally try things a new way with a businessman (even with all his flaws) running things rather than a politician.
I agree. The timing was perfect.

In past elections, that Billy Bush interview of Trump bashing women would have buried a candidate. Like Gary Hart when the Donna Rice affair came out he was done. This didn't happen this time as people were ready for a non-establishment candidate.

If nothing else, Trump opened the door for an outsider to get elected. Although I think if Ross Perot would have stayed at it, he would have been the first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 05:12 AM
 
Location: Southeastern North Carolina
2,690 posts, read 4,218,086 times
Reputation: 4790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
He campaigned on a free wall, one which is paid by Mexico, but now he is threatening to shut down the government unless the American taxpayer pays for it. Why not collect voluntary contributions from those who actually want a wall?
Excellent idea. The Magaheads and Trump Humpers can pay for it, after all they're all rolling in dough now after Dear Leader's Bigly Beautiful tax cut, right?

So, are all of you Trumpettes going to take up a collection for the Great Wall of Trump? Or are you perhaps a tiny bit concerned that your contributions would just go to pay for Trump's legal fees, or perhaps his 2020 scam-paign?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 05:17 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,669 posts, read 14,631,326 times
Reputation: 15379
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
You mean the same states that Hillary either 1) thought were in the bag or 2) never even visited - like Wisconsin. Those states, right? At least Trump worked to win them and is trying to help with the economy. Hillary got exactly what she deserved -- a crushing and narrow loss, directly attributable to her own incompetence and arrogance. And I pray that the democrats nominate her again in 2020.
You’re right, he worked all those little towns that Clinton didn’t bother with. That doesn’t change the fact he got them to vote for him rather than sit out the election entirely (like many did) by selling snake oil to desperate fools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
You’re right, he worked all those little towns that Clinton didn’t bother with. That doesn’t change the fact he got them to vote for him rather than sit out the election entirely (like many did) by selling snake oil to desperate fools.
So the option was, either vote for a guy who took the time to visit our area, or vote for Hillary because, well, darn it, there's a glass ceiling to shatter, and it's her turn.

Or as you said, sit out the election, and then Crooked Hillary wins anyway.

You are going to lose again in 2020 if you democrats have the same attitude.

Last edited by BeerGeek40; 12-13-2018 at 06:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 06:34 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
You have some data that all or even most of the transfers are from illegals? I would suspect that most of the transfers are from legals and US citizens helping out the family at the old home. There is certainly a class of young men here illegally who do send money home. But otherwise it is likely the more established who are legal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
I'd call that new math. Or, to please google "Idiot Math".
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
To say nothing that anyone who sends money obviously spends more here - just to live and survive. Many also pay taxes here now.

There have been enough studies on immigration to clearly show it's a benefit...if anything.

Of course, those who know things are aware that Americans simply won't do most of those jobs. How many people are lining up to work at Chicken Killing Plants?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Mexico will pay dearly for it....




https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...-year-are-sent


26 billion a years worth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
He campaigned on a free wall, one which is paid by Mexico, but now he is threatening to shut down the government unless the American taxpayer pays for it. Why not collect voluntary contributions from those who actually want a wall?



It got quite...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2018, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
16,269 posts, read 10,395,161 times
Reputation: 27575
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
NICE job of conveniently overlooking the FACT he also ran his campaign on Mexico paying to build that wall.

Of course he also ran on the premise he was not just another lying politician which we now know to be the biggest lie of all.

This post should have ended the thread. It's not just the wall, it's that he said we would not be paying for it and now he is threatening to shut down the government if we don't pay for it. That's not what he promised.

And the fact that his supporters let him get away with it, and every other lie he tells, is the real problem with America today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top