Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why can't families exist? Because the minute the parents claim a newborn child as their own, it is legitimizing an unjust social hierarchy that the baby never consented to. The children cannot reject something they never agreed to in the first place, and must be immediately taken from their parents at birth. Therefore, anarchists should focus on ending all families.
Can families exist in anarchy? And if so, why is a familial hierarchy morally justifiable when a state is not - given that both rely on social contracts that are not consented to.
Can families exist in anarchy? And if so, why is a familial hierarchy morally justifiable when a state is not - given that both rely on social contracts that are not consented to.
Awesome question. I need to review some of my material but will get back to you on it. Thanks.
If the head of a head of the house is a White liberal mother-in-law, that's perhaps worse than anarchy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
