Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you happy with Trump’s deal to reopen the Federal government for 3 weeks?
I’m happy with the deal 41 36.61%
It’s ok 50 44.64%
I’m unhappy with this deal 21 18.75%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:46 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lkb0714 View Post
That’s a lie.

The budgets submitted before the shutdown were bipartisan, they were literally written before the Democrats took back the house. Trump chose not to sign the bipartisan budget. That means the “sides” were Trump vs both republicans and democrats.

No, the above is the lie. The Senate passed a CR without wall and the House passed a CR with wall. There was never a single bill passed by both chambers for Trump to sign. There was never a bill on Trump's desk to sign. That is patently clear because a pocket veto requires 10 days for a passed bill to go unsigned and we were never in a 10 day waiting period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:48 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
If the shutdown doesn't end soon, chances are those "dumb" (as you call them) federal employee border patrol folks will just open up the border gates and go home. If you think there's insufficient border security now, just wait 'till that happens. Remember videos of all those tens of thousands eastern Europeans flooding across the "collapsed" Iron Curtain?

Ken

Awesome. There's a bona fide National Emergency that not even Ninth Circus could stop. Great opportunity to enforce the border with military with full authorization to use force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 09:49 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmilyFoxSeaton View Post
This is their "help" - they will offer you a loan at 0% for ... wait for it... 60 days. Useless help.

How is that useless unless the shutdown extends beyond 60 days, in which case they could extend the loan repayment. A loan at 0% that could be repaid in full with backpay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,811,747 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Awesome. There's a bona fide National Emergency that not even Ninth Circus could stop. Great opportunity to enforce the border with military with full authorization to use force.
If trump proclaims a bona fide National Emergency, do you think Mexico will finally pay for the wall as trump promised?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:09 AM
 
Location: AZ
3,321 posts, read 1,100,375 times
Reputation: 1608
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Awesome. There's a bona fide National Emergency that not even Ninth Circus could stop. Great opportunity to enforce the border with military with full authorization to use force.
You might as well come out and admit you want a one-party totalitarian dictatorship; quit beating around the bushes and just say it already.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:09 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,328,298 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Awesome. There's a bona fide National Emergency that not even Ninth Circus could stop. Great opportunity to enforce the border with military with full authorization to use force.
LOL

The military could secure the 2000 mile border - eventually. Wouldn't be quick though, and folks would flood across the border by the thousands within MINUTES. Mobilizing the military takes FARRRRRR longer than that.
There would probably be more successful illegal crossings in the 1st hour than there are in a typical year.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:13 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,585,801 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
No, the above is the lie. The Senate passed a CR without wall and the House passed a CR with wall. There was never a single bill passed by both chambers for Trump to sign. There was never a bill on Trump's desk to sign. That is patently clear because a pocket veto requires 10 days for a passed bill to go unsigned and we were never in a 10 day waiting period.
Technically, no bill ever reached Trump's desk - that is true. However, you would be hard pressed to argue that Trump did not, in essence, veto the budget. The House and Senate publicly agreed to a budget without a wall. The Senate passed that bill 100-0. Then Trump summoned Paul Ryan to the White House and, lo and behold, Ryan had complete and total a change of heart and refused to put the bill to the floor. Now, the new House has passed the same Senate bill that passed 100-0 and sent it back to the Senate and McConnell refuses to put it to the floor and has expressly said that it is at Trump's behest that he is not doing so.

So, did Trump refuse to sign a particular budget sitting on his desk? No. But Trump chose not to sign the bipartisan budget by directing Ryan and McConnell to ensure that it never reached his desk. Functionally, it is the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:13 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,216,625 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
LOL

The military could secure the 2000 mile border - eventually. Wouldn't be quick though, and folks would flood across the border by the thousands within MINUTES. Mobilizing the military takes FARRRRRR longer than that.

Ken

The military can mobilize faster than the caravans. Last fall, the military wasn't even a thought until the caravans were in southern Mexico and they still got to the border and laid hundreds of miles of razor wire long before the caravans arrived.



You seem unaware that over 50,000 per month are already coming over. Even if thousands more come over in the first months, it would be vastly made up by steep reductions in the following months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:16 AM
 
34,046 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17204
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
The Senate passed a CR without wall and the House passed a CR with wall. There was never a single bill passed by both chambers for Trump to sign. There was never a bill on Trump's desk to sign. .
Correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2019, 10:30 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,328,298 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
The military can mobilize faster than the caravans. Last fall, the military wasn't even a thought until the caravans were in southern Mexico and they still got to the border and laid hundreds of miles of razor wire long before the caravans arrived.



You seem unaware that over 50,000 per month are already coming over. Even if thousands more come over in the first months, it would be vastly made up by steep reductions in the following months.
Um. I'm not referring to CARAVANS. I'm talking about the thousands of people right across the BORDER. Tens of thousands would stream across in the 1st HOUR.

And if you are thinking that U.S. soldiers are just going to gun down families coming across the border, you are sadly mistaken in projecting racist KKK/Neo-NAZI mentality on folks who don't really believe in that garbage. I come from a military family and there is NO WAY the majority of U.S. soldiers would ever do that. You'd be hard-pressed to find even a small minority willing to do it. Much as YOU may WANT to, military or not, you can't just gun down unarmed civilians - even if they are crossing the border illegally (a misdemeanor on the 1st offense).
The fact is the U.S. military is not trained or equipped for that kind of duty. They could do it, but they'd be less effective than the BP.

Ken

Last edited by LordBalfor; 01-19-2019 at 10:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top