Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes and I can have lunch with anyone I wanted too. But if my wife suspects me of cheating on her with a woman in my office and I then proceeded to have a private lunch with this woman it looks a bit different no?
I should say.
In fact, if I found out my spouse had a half dozen private meetings with a woman from the office, that no one else attended, and that he refused to tell even his work colleagues what the meetings were about, I'd be freezing the bank accounts.
I wanted a president that could be trusted to preserve information related to his/her official duties in office!!!
Someone like Hillary!!!!
He had the transcripts destroyed. Were you OK when Hillary destroyed records?
A President CAN NOT have a private conversation in an official diplomatic setting. He is there on behalf of the American people, at the expense of the American People, and what is said or done is the business of the American People.
What about the fact IT WASN'T PUBLIC are you seemingly incapable of grasping?
I am capable of grasping that it was public knowledge that he was having a conversation with Putin, the contents of which were not made public.
My point is that the public does not know that he has conversations with Putin on a regular basis.
I'm not disputing that we deserve to know what is said during these conversations. But we never will.
The most incriminating conversations that he has with Putin will never be made public.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.