Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Labor Unions be taxed like a business is?
Yes: Pay their Fair Share! 56 65.88%
Kind of: They should pay more, but not quite as much as a business. 2 2.35%
No: Leave Unions with their special privileges! 27 31.76%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-26-2019, 05:48 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,960,029 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Unions have lobbyists - so you do support taxing unions!



Tax Unions and throw out all the lobbyists all in one bill.
Sound Good?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2019, 08:16 PM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,848,003 times
Reputation: 12328
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
People have mentioned taxing the church on here. I think it is also time that we start looking at taxing unions.


LINK

Unions rake in billions (mostly from dues) and are extremely political. They have become big business.

Many unions do not have recertification votes for 20 or more years. Many unions do not allow private ballots on recertification votes so you can be "influenced" to vote the "correct" way.

Some unions including public unions own their own health insurance provider. They then use their power to create a monopoly whereby the employer (often the school --> government) is forced to only use their service. They then overcharge for their product ripping off the taxpayer. Their health insurance provider can claim non-profit status as they pay high wages and donate leftovers to politicians (democrats).

Unions should start paying their fair share including public unions.


Furthermore, union dues are exempted from federal taxes and many state taxes on household income taxes. So it is a double whammy of special interest subsidies!!!


This isn't even an extreme position, FDR thought that public unions shouldn't have the right to exist - all I am asking is that they pay their fair share.

FDR on public unions:

</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/Style/Default/Stylesheet.aspx"></link><script type="text/javascript" src="/Stats/Stats.js?version=1.0.0.1"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="/Scripts/JWPlayer/jwplayer.js"></script><scr
Sounds like a case of sour grapes.............................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2019, 10:27 PM
 
32,068 posts, read 15,062,274 times
Reputation: 13687
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Some public employee unions do.
Which ones
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2019, 10:43 PM
 
2,151 posts, read 1,355,849 times
Reputation: 1786
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000 View Post
Not everyone is educated. The poll is invalid as a result... but so are many others you see on here and elsewhere.
Exactly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 06:12 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,023 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Yep...as soon as we put that corporate tax back up to 35%.
Don't be deliberately obtuse. Corporate taxes, as everyone should know, are paid by the end users: the consumers of corporations' products and services, as taxes are figured into the pricing formula as an overhead expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 06:16 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,023 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13711
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
2004? Doesn't sound like it's a big deal anymore, so why are you carrying on about it? https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/g...b41d2b32f.html
It's not a big deal anymore because Gov Walker broke the teachers union's iron-clad grip on their grifting insurance scam that cost WI taxpayers an unnecessary extra $100 million/year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 06:52 AM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
2004? Doesn't sound like it's a big deal anymore, so why are you carrying on about it? https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/g...b41d2b32f.html
You are the poster who had zero clue that it was happening in Wisconsin and doubted it.

You are being clueless again.

This type of union owned health care monopoly swindling happens all over the country. The Democrats are all too eager to look the other way as some of it comes back to them as campaign contributions.

It will possibly even happen again in Wisconsin when the Democrats take total control there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Don't be deliberately obtuse. Corporate taxes, as everyone should know, are paid by the end users: the consumers of corporations' products and services, as taxes are figured into the pricing formula as an overhead expense.
In a different case...wouldn't the special subsidies and tax privileges to labor unions and to union members' dues come from the tax payers...and add to our staggering debt?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Sounds like a case of sour grapes.............................
Sounds like you can't articulate an intelligent response to any of my points. Your post reconfirms my correctness in my position. Thank you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
You are the poster who had zero clue that it was happening in Wisconsin and doubted it.
You are being clueless again.
This type of union owned health care monopoly swindling happens all over the country. The Democrats are all too eager to look the other way as some of it comes back to them as campaign contributions.
It will possibly even happen again in Wisconsin when the Democrats take total control there.
In a different case...wouldn't the special subsidies and tax privileges to labor unions and to union members' dues come from the tax payers...and add to our staggering debt?
Sounds like you can't articulate an intelligent response to any of my points. Your post reconfirms my correctness in my position. Thank you!
Sounds like you want to start a thread and attack anyone who disagrees with you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 10:33 AM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Sounds like you want to start a thread and attack anyone who disagrees with you
I am sorry if I am too blunt.

However, you denied the reality of union owned health insurance providers granted a monopoly that then overcharge the tax payers....you most likely denied this, because it is bad...seems too bad to be true.

When presented with facts you make a second assumption that the WEA (Wisconsin's teachers' union) is the only place this happens...and then say old news...no big deal....time to stop "carrying on."

When it is pointed out that there are other examples of this all over the country....you dodge...

Sounds like you want to make false assumptions and then ignore the need for reform when proven wrong, because it doesn't fit your preferred political team. That is not good. Sorry if pointing out your false assumptions and dodges is an attack.

Your disagreement was 100% factually incorrect...so...I'll try to be nicer, but you should try to adhere to reality and then admit that there is a problem if you can't stay in reality to dispute the position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2019, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,010,801 times
Reputation: 2167
Any discussion of unions needs to carefully distinguish between public and private sector. They are two entirely different kettles of fish. Public sector is essentially a kickback scheme that would be unethical and probably illegal in other contexts.

Public sector unions ultimately are dealing with elected politicians--the same politicians whom the union assiduously worked to get in office. Private sector unions have to negotiate with company mgmt., and therefore meet somewhere in the middle.

This is why the SCOTUS Janus ruling applied only to public sector unions.

As OP has pointed out (IIRC) FDR, who brought forth most of the major union legislation we still operate under, was adamantly opposed to public sector unionism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top