Quote:
Originally Posted by AleeGee
are you freaking kidding?
|
You have been accustomed to believing the global warming hoax without critically evaluating the situation. If you do so, you will see that it does not make scientific sense and is a hoax. You just refuse to think for yourself.
Think about it
CO2 is 4% of atmospheric gases
4.5% of CO2 in the atmosphere is made by man
The duration of CO2 in the atmosphere is 5 years
Co2 absorbs 1/30th the amount of IR energy compared to water vapor
The contribution of man-made CO2 to atmospheric warming is 1/1,500,000 th that of water vapor
The "saturation point" of CO2 in the atmosphere at which point existing CO2 could cause temp increases is 8-10X more than it is now
CO2 was reduced 60% in the Great Depression, yet temps went up
in WW2 CO2 production increased dramatically, yet temps went down
You can refuse to look at or consider any contrary data- that is your choice. However, a good hypothesis welcomes new data, as it will prove the hypothesis true. A flawed premise, on the other hand, will not withstand further scrutiny and data, as is the case with "global warming".
Do the "CO2 experiment" of taking a saturated CO2 atmosphere (the liquid above a recently opened liter soda bottle) vs a low CO2 atmosphere (a bottle that has been left open for a day). Shine a heat lamp in them from an equidistant point and measure the temperature of the gas in each. They are the same. Now why does not the super saturated CO2 "atmosphere" have a higher temp?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
