Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just wondering how people feel about the Democrats' new abortion position. That position was articulated by Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, when he stated that one option would be to deliver the baby, make him or her comfortable, and then have a discussion with the mother about whether the baby should live or die.
Personally, I strongly disagree. What do you think?
What Northam "articulated" is not what is actually an option in the bill.
So are you asking if we support the asinine gibberish that came out of Northam's mouth or the actual bill?
Do you support the Democrats' new abortion position?
The poll questions are not honest, and judging by the number of threads opened about the same thing, with the same misinformation, it is clear this is what Repubs have been instructed to spread.
Here is the "position" on abortion.
b) 2. The physician and two consulting physicians certify certifies and so enter enters in the hospital record of the woman, that in their the physician's medical opinion, based upon their the physician's best clinical judgment, the continuation of the pregnancy is likely to result in the death of the woman or substantially and irremediably impair the mental or physical health of the woman.
(c) 3. Measures for life support for the product of such abortion or miscarriage must shall be available and utilized if there is any clearly visible evidence of viability.
I don't know the specifics of the law, but after the baby is born it's no longer the woman's body and the baby has right to life.
Granted, if the baby is terminally ill and a medical professional has decided it's a lost cause, the mother can choose to end life support and hold the baby for a while.
I don't know the specifics of the law, but after the baby is born it's no longer the woman's body and the baby has right to life.
Granted, if the baby is terminally ill and a medical professional has decided it's a lost cause, the mother can choose to end life support and hold the baby for a while.
Which is exactly what the law allows for. It allows to deny heroic measures in the case on a non viable infant. It has nothing to do with a healthy newborn.
He was a monster and an anomaly. That's why he was prosecuted. There can and always will be outliers.
Right!
Using Gosnell is not productive to the argument about abortion.
There are people ….hired killers....who will do your Uncle Charlie in for not having repaid a large loan to you.
Gosnell was not someone to us in any debate about abortion but more closely related to a "gun for hire"
Which is exactly what the law allows for. It allows to deny heroic measures in the case on a non viable infant. It has nothing to do with a healthy newborn.
There's no reason for such a law. That already is the law. The pro-abortion ghouls are trying to codify baby-killing, so long as the mother wants to do it.
There's no reason for such a law. That already is the law. The pro-abortion ghouls are trying to codify baby-killing, so long as the mother wants to do it.
Your opinions are not facts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
