Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:55 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053

Advertisements

Will Democratic NJ Gov. Phil Murphy sign the rain tax ? No kidding its a real thing.

How sick is this ? Tax fever !!! Rain, rain go away. They will have everyone in the state praying.



New Jersey residents face possible 'rain tax'
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new...-with-rain-tax

The bill, approved by the New Jersey Assembly and the Senate, would allow municipalities to create utilities that can collect fees from homeowners and business owners that have large paved surfaces, like driveways and parking lots. During storms, rainwater mixes with pollutants on those surfaces before running into sewers and drains.

Last edited by phma; 02-06-2019 at 06:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:15 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Large paved surfaces are usually limited by zoning laws. As in, only a certain percentage of the lot can have a non-porous footprint. Where I live now in NC, we are limited to: only 25% of the lot can have a non-porous footprint (which means buildings, paved walkways/driveways, patios, pools, etc.).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:18 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
They are already doing this in the Susquehanna watershed under mandate from the EPA. The bills just went out about month back in my area, people are losing their minds because some of them are quite expensive. The money is supposed to be spent on storm water upgrades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,102 posts, read 9,015,533 times
Reputation: 18759
Maryland tried that, then it was defeated. If Murphy wants to do it, then he should do it. He ran his campaign on raising taxes more than a billion dollars. I don't see the problem, it's what the voters wanted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:26 AM
 
Location: Alabama
956 posts, read 744,758 times
Reputation: 1492
Wow, you libs will not give up on stealing money from people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:30 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,088,442 times
Reputation: 15538
City of Richmond did it with the collected monies earmarked for storm water management programs, my moms condo community was billed with each owner paying a portion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:35 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,483,864 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by unlblkrubi View Post
Wow, you libs will not give up on stealing money from people.
Wow, you 'pubs will not give up on poisoning air and water and ruining the environment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:39 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,199 posts, read 7,223,380 times
Reputation: 17473
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Wow, you 'pubs will not give up on poisoning air and water and ruining the environment.
So you don't drive, use electricity or eat foods made possible through the use of fossil fuels?

Just like Gore and DiCaprio, you libs are hypocrites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:42 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Wow, you 'pubs will not give up on poisoning air and water and ruining the environment.
Any proof of that going on, or just stick em up hand over your money and everything is gonna be alright
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 06:44 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,193,725 times
Reputation: 18824
I’m trying to figure out what the problem is here.

Processing contaminated water costs money. Who is supposed to pay for that expenditure if not the people who actually contaminate the water and expect it to get recycled?

I wish you guys were this vigilant about war spending...God forbid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top