Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:00 AM
 
51,652 posts, read 25,813,568 times
Reputation: 37889

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
This is Whitaker telling Nadler to eat it, live on CSPAN.
...
House Judiciary Committee has oversight on the DOJ.

Though it is hardly surprised you think that "Telling Nadler to eat it" was a smart move, those in the room thought it was so stupid that they literally laughed at him.

Whittaker can get snotty, stall, meander around from topic to topic all he wants, but this low level con man is in over his head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:03 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
Someone has given Whittaker the advice to stall and waste the members’ time in long meandering responses
Nader just should have a rule change that likely would pass with his majority that says any member’s time is only for a question—not for the response
So if Whitaker takes an hour to answer one question it does not affect the member’s quotient of time
Let him take 8 hrs to answer one question—
They all are just waiting him out

He really is proof the Iowa law school turns out poor specimen of attorney
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:06 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,518,202 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Someone has given Whittaker the advice to stall and waste the members’ time in long meandering responses
Nader just should have a rule change that likely would pass with his majority that says any member’s time is only for a question—not for the response
So if Whitaker takes an hour to answer one question it does not affect the member’s quotient of time
Let him take 8 hrs to answer one question—
They all are just waiting him out

He really is proof the Iowa law school turns out poor specimen of attorney
You should have seen Obama's treasury secretary Jack Lew when appeared at these oversight hearings. Whitaker has been charmingly cooperative compared to the meandering, irrelevant shtick that Jack Lew used to trawl out.

How does your own home cooking taste, Dems?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:15 AM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,802,950 times
Reputation: 15336
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
should have said that about the corrupt Obama and hitlery
I've always said if Obama or Hillary are guilty of something they should be prosecuted. I remember Hillary being involved in her fair share of hours-long grillings on a multitude of subjects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Huntsville, AL
2,985 posts, read 1,748,885 times
Reputation: 4405
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Someone has given Whittaker the advice to stall and waste the members’ time in long meandering responses
Nader just should have a rule change that likely would pass with his majority that says any member’s time is only for a question—not for the response
So if Whitaker takes an hour to answer one question it does not affect the member’s quotient of time
Let him take 8 hrs to answer one question—
They all are just waiting him out

He really is proof the Iowa law school turns out poor specimen of attorney
I doubt this suggestion would be freely offered if this witness was a democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:32 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,443,819 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
This is Whitaker telling Nadler to eat it, live on CSPAN.

The standard was set during the Obama years. And anyone who wants to whine about "whataboutism," you can eat it too. The precedents set by Obama and his regime matter and now your people are going to eat their own home cooking, whether they like it or not.
hahahahaha. I LOVE it!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
I've always said if Obama or Hillary are guilty of something they should be prosecuted. I remember Hillary being involved in her fair share of hours-long grillings on a multitude of subjects.
yes Hillary was grilled... but lynch/Obama protected her...no matter what was found, she was protected
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:36 AM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,576,536 times
Reputation: 14393
I'm listening to Rush laugh about this, saying Whitaker is driving the Dems nuts. Is anyone in lamestream media asking why Whitaker is being grilled when he's only been there a month? He wasn't involved like Rod Rosenstein has been for years. Schiffty doesn't dare call Rosenstein! God forbid the truth get out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,173 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
I've always said if Obama or Hillary are guilty of something they should be prosecuted. I remember Hillary being involved in her fair share of hours-long grillings on a multitude of subjects.
Eleven hours on Benghazi alone, and she didn't stutter and beat around the bush and ramble on to avoid questions when she answered.

Probably because she knew she had done nothing wrong. Dodging is a certain indicator that tehre is something being hidden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:55 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,532,093 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
What we know is that little sniveling coward Nunes has blocked justice and protected this so-called president unethically, for two years.

And we know who the con men and flunkies are here.

"...Prior to his gig in the Trump administration, Whitaker was a member of the advisory board of World Patent Marketing, a Florida company that got the corporate equivalent of a death sentence from a federal judge for ripping off customers. In May 2018 Judge Darrin Gayles shut down the company, ordered it to pay a fine of about $26 million, and blocked defendants from future participation in any "invention promotion service" following a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission..."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...torney-general

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...m-machine.html
That is Trump's kind of guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top