Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2019, 06:33 PM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,115,170 times
Reputation: 8471

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Poor guy is having a tough time, embarrassed by Trump.



Kamala Harris, Call-Out Star
The toughest progressive we’ve seen in a long time

By David Brooks

The more you learn about Kamala Harris, the more formidable she appears. She is an amazing amalgam of different elements — highly educated elite meritocrat, Oakland street fighter, crusading, rough-elbow prosecutor, canny machine pol and telegenic rhetorical brawler.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/o...rris-2020.html

https://www.indianagazette.com/opini...420c155d5.html
I'd like her for 8 or 9-minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2019, 07:36 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merriman80 View Post
Lol no she's not. Liberals truly do have the lowest standards in women. AOC horseface isn't hot either.

Now, Melania is easy on the eyes.
Lol...I love it when dudes come online and pretend to play in a romantic league that in reality is far above their standard.

You Conservatives think Laura Ingraham is hot.

So pipe down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 08:02 PM
 
958 posts, read 303,957 times
Reputation: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
David Brooks is the only conservative I trust and respect. I haven't given Harris much notice before, but with Brooks' recommendation, I'll have to take a closer look.
Brooks isn't a conservative. No conservative would write glowingly about this sleep-around Marxist know-nothing. Let's face it. Kamala is dumber than a box of doughnuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 08:21 PM
 
271 posts, read 139,681 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
David Brooks is far from conservative.

And apparently he thinks sleeping your way to the top makes you an "elite meritocrat". What a doofus!

He's a Canadian who to the US as a devout Israeli firster ----- that tells me everything I need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Lee County, NC
3,318 posts, read 2,335,731 times
Reputation: 4382
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
She’s easy on the eyes. Real easy.
I've seen better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,814,475 times
Reputation: 35584
David Brooks is a conservative? The things you learn on CD!

Let's see...He endorses Kamala Harris, he's for big government which "nudges" and influences citizens " in a good way," he's a vociferous Never-Trumper, he says that he's a believer in "progressive conservatism" (plain old liberalism), he conflates immigrants with illegal aliens (as liberals do), he rails against "immigrant-bashing nativism"...and if I hear him give any more kudos to RINO globalist, Jeff Flake, I'm gonna spit up.

Memo to liberals: Stop flapping your gums on subjects, like firearms and, now, conservatives, about which you obviously know nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 09:04 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
He was never a conservative, he was pro Hilary last I remember. I have no idea why people here thinks he is liberal. Fake news again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 09:53 PM
 
7,982 posts, read 4,283,738 times
Reputation: 6744
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
She ****ed ole Willie Brown, come on now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll View Post
Willie Brown. Did he have unprotected sex with porn stars and playboy bunnies while his wife nursed a newborn? Did he fight his own personal Vietnam by avoiding STDs? Did he sexually assault countless women, not to mention peeping in on teenage pageant girls?

Give me a million Willie Browns over Individual 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
So the only way you can defend this tramp is by comparing her to the President? That’s pathetic. ��
You brought up Willie Brown, and I’m comparing Willie Brown to the tramp in the Oval Office (Individual 1).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 09:56 PM
 
7,982 posts, read 4,283,738 times
Reputation: 6744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
In all honesty, I despised Harris when she and Gillibrand forced Franken out. Although I still think that was a mistake, after listening to her, I kind of like her. We know she's smart, but she seems fun and energetic as well--and like she's not afraid to be herself.

Also--the liberal members of my family, who fall on various points of the spectrum all like her. I think her race is somewhat irrelevant--and she would appeal to minorities, females and progressives in general.

So, right now, I'm thinking Harris/Brown would be a pretty good ticket.

They are both appealing to the left--Harris has a younger, progressive, diverse and female vibe;

Brown would own the Midwest. He's a truly authentic working class champion and very popular in Ohio. I think his earthy authenticity would be a stark contrast to Trump's phoniness and cosmetic vanity.

Harris is young, energetic and smart--also would be huge contrast to old overweight and fairly uninformed, Trump. She would run circles around him.
Great post!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2019, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
8,750 posts, read 3,116,288 times
Reputation: 1747
"Kamala Harris Was Not a ‘Progressive Prosecutor’
The senator was often on the wrong side of history when she served as California’s attorney general."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/17/o...l-justice.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top