Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-19-2019, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Gods country
8,105 posts, read 6,752,854 times
Reputation: 10421

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Just so to clear and we all understand your thinking..........


You're saying that LITERALLY, every elected official in Washington DC except for Lindsey Graham, is plotting against Donald Trump?

Please oh please tell me that's what you're saying.
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2019, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Gods country
8,105 posts, read 6,752,854 times
Reputation: 10421
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Wow.

I totally agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 06:04 PM
 
12,017 posts, read 14,323,903 times
Reputation: 5981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Above Average Bear View Post
It seems that the only Republican supporting Trump is Lynsey Graham, I see him and only him on FOX. Every other Republican, Democrat, the main stream media, and the deep state are plotting against him.
Tin foil hat alert
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Gods country
8,105 posts, read 6,752,854 times
Reputation: 10421
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
Tin foil hat alert

Instead of insulting me, please refute my point. Who have you seen on the main stream media supporting Trump?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willamette City View Post
When did you get to read the Mueller report?
It's been clearly established that the Russia investigation and the Strzok-McCabe "insurance policy" are one and the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 09:26 PM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,306,076 times
Reputation: 45727
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
https://www.conservativereview.com/n...vITC5pb3B-JOAs


"Fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s book tour began with a “60 minutes” interview this week in which he confirmed that he commenced an effort to remove President Trump from office, citing his concerns with the president’s supposed ties to Russia, for which no evidence has ever surfaced."

Andrew McCabe was far from the only FBI official to disgrace himself. Other now-fired FBI officials, such as James Comey and Peter Strzok, helped transform the FBI into a political weapon to sabotage the president through the baseless Trump-Russia investigation. There are still only two primary explanations for their conduct. The first is they were simply incompetent and commenced a probe without sufficient nonpartisan evidence. The second and more likely explanation is that McCabe and his cohorts were on a hell-bent quest to overturn the results of the election. Call it what it was: a soft coup attempt. Luckily for our republic, the coup attempt failed."

Hard to believe this could happen in our country. How would the media act if the Obama administration was treated this way?
McCabe's entire conduct was not unimpeachable and the Inspector General found fault with some of his actions. Trump took advantage of that and terminated McCabe literally 72 hours before he could qualify for a pension he had worked over twenty years to obtain.

The basic notion that Trump had to be investigated for connections to the Russians is unavoidable. Trump had a series of business relationships with the Russians that predated by years his presidential campaign. Evidence surfaced through emails released to the Trump campaign from Russian computer trolls. Other things happened too that raised serious questions. The Trump Tower meeting was an example. The point is that sufficient information was present for the FBI to investigate whether Trump was a witting or unwitting Russian asset. Trump only made his situation worse and raised questions about his loyalty when he fired FBI Director James Comey and than proceeded to fire Andy McCabe, the acting FBI Director, while these claims were being investigated.

I do not know what Bob Mueller's Investigation will ultimately find. Perhaps, Trump will be exonerated in some fashion. I do know that the facts in this case required an investigation and McCabe was simply doing his job, no matter what his voting preferences were in 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Haiku
7,132 posts, read 4,768,427 times
Reputation: 10327
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
It's been clearly established that the Russia investigation and the Strzok-McCabe "insurance policy" are one and the same.
Clearly established by whom?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post
You misstate the situation when you use the term "coup" in your thread's title. McCabe and others discussed the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to the Constitution - quite legally and obviously constitutionally - because they were extremely concerned about Trump's fitness to be in office as the President of the United States. This is far different from a coup, which is an illegal overthrow of government, usually by force.
-- distinction without a difference --
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2019, 10:31 PM
 
6,573 posts, read 6,740,252 times
Reputation: 8793
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
McCabe's entire conduct was not unimpeachable and the Inspector General found fault with some of his actions. Trump took advantage of that and terminated McCabe literally 72 hours before he could qualify for a pension he had worked over twenty years to obtain.

The basic notion that Trump had to be investigated for connections to the Russians is unavoidable. Trump had a series of business relationships with the Russians that predated by years his presidential campaign. Evidence surfaced through emails released to the Trump campaign from Russian computer trolls. Other things happened too that raised serious questions. The Trump Tower meeting was an example. The point is that sufficient information was present for the FBI to investigate whether Trump was a witting or unwitting Russian asset. Trump only made his situation worse and raised questions about his loyalty when he fired FBI Director James Comey and than proceeded to fire Andy McCabe, the acting FBI Director, while these claims were being investigated.

I do not know what Bob Mueller's Investigation will ultimately find. Perhaps, Trump will be exonerated in some fashion. I do know that the facts in this case required an investigation and McCabe was simply doing his job, no matter what his voting preferences were in 2016.
Except Trump did not terminate McCabe....the FBI & the DOJ did. I stopped reading the rest of your post after that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 01:15 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Their job is to go after criminals.

We shouldn't have a criminal in the oval office.

Just FYI.


I guess you're talking about every president since Carter, and he was a ****ing disaster!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top