Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2019, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Marquette, Mich
1,316 posts, read 747,160 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
So a warm summer is not a weather event, it's a climatic change????

It can be evidence of global climactic change if it is an outlier. That's a simple enough concept. I'm always shocked when people don't understand it.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
And if the warmists can corrupt enough scientists to climb on board the hoax train, and discredit or squeeze out any scientists actually doing real science, then the warmists win.


Just a couple years ago even the UK Met Office and NASA were forced to accept the truth and were writing reports acknowledging a two decade pause in the global mean surface temperatures.



It's government that wants control over the people, and man-made global warming climate change is their best chance to convince the people to empower government over them. So what happens when government pours billions of taxpayer dollars into only the studies, techniques, data collection and manipulation which helps them in their agenda? It's simple, the data we see will be one-sided.


You don't see the obvious? It's the government which wants control over the people, industry, production and our way of life, and it's not curious how 97% of government researchers are on the side of the government's agenda?

Selling global climate change is the best way to control the people? Really? I think you're a little off on that. If you believe so strongly, why don't YOU become a climate scientist to study the truth and tell everyone? Me? I can look at maps, averages, outliers in local/regional weather, etc, and see what IS happening.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50 View Post
“Ice, snow, and frost will disappear, i.e. milder winters” … “Unusually warm winters without snow and ice are now being viewed by many as signs of climate change.”

Schleswig Holstein NABU, 10 Feb 2007

Notice the word "now" in the climate prediction. We are 12 years past his now and still plenty of winter snow.

People entrenched in climate hysteria are absolutely unable to overlay these failed predictions onto their belief system. It's kinda funny. They don't want to shatter their id, their sense of moral progression, or their worldview.

I live in a place that has historically had pretty high snow totals. We've seen a dramatic shift in when we get snow and how much we get at a time. It's a roller coaster of extremes--including temperature shifts of more than 30 degrees (from -5 to 25 is a crazy ride) and having lower than average snow for a month, then higher than average the next. It's been a rough few winters for a place that relies on snow for winter tourism.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Geez, people need to learn how the hemispheres work.


It's summer there.


Whatever you all are the geniuses who want to control everyone else while being controlled yourselves.

Parts of Australia have been suffering from terrible heat and drought--the key is where it says "record-breaking" in the reports. Meaning it's hotter/dryer than normal. Try looking at the whole phrase. Sometimes words mean things.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
And when these people make their dire predictions of man-made global warming, and they refuse to come true, they don't doubt their theory, they just make up another theory to explain why the first one is still true, even if their climate predictions based upon their theory is not coming true.

From the Met Office's report in 2013: The Recent Pause in Global Warming

Global mean surface temperatures rose rapidly from the 1970s, but there has been little further warming over the most recent 10 to 15 years to 2013. This has prompted speculation that human induced global warming is no longer happening, or at least will be much smaller than predicted. Others maintain that this is a temporary pause and that temperatures will again rise at rates seen previously.

They were puzzled as to why the warming they predicted didn't come true. They scrambled to explain why their man-made global warming predictions failed, and switched to calling it climate change instead. One new theory they have added is that the oceans are suddenly absorbing all the warming they predicted, as if the oceans were unable, or unwilling to do so in the past, and the oceans absorbing surface warmth is a new phenomenon.

Do you understand how science works? When a theory is posited, and then some new data challenges part of it, you don't throw it all away. You follow that change and find out what's happening. Data supports this no matter how hard you try to ignore it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50 View Post
But the world isn't losing snow. It's snowing in other places in large quantities. There's no shortage. Weather patterns can't be anecdotal in one area and proof of climate change in another. LOL. You are bought in. I'm glad you found a cause you believe in, because it sure as hell isn't science.

Wut? The world isn't losing snow? So diminishing snow pack in the Alps is equaled by a few flakes falling in a place that doesn't normally see it? It doesn't work that way. That's utterly ridiculous. Please try to look at what you're saying.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50 View Post
Already refers to now not the future. But it's written funky so I'll concede to your point about it referring to the temperature.

So are you down for the bet or not? No snow globally in the winter of 2021. I think there will be snow.

In addition to science, you need a grammar lesson. Try looking up "future perfect" to see what you can find. It'll open up a whole world to you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2019, 10:35 AM
 
4,445 posts, read 1,448,433 times
Reputation: 3609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Climate science was not a partisan political subject in the USA until the Koch brothers put their big dark money on it. Republicans and Democrats alike were alarmed and directed more research on this subject.

The rest of the world, uninfluenced by these dirty shenanigans by American businesspeople, sees global warming as a common worldwide threat, regardless of their political orientation in their own countries. Right wing Americans are alone in the whole world on this subject ... the entire world, and most Americans disagree with the Republicans on this issue (which bodes poorly for Republican prospects in the USA's future).

You are on the wrong side of history friend, and our descendants, yours and mine, will be enraged at our generation's lack of resolve in tackling this problem while we could have had the most positive success for our efforts.
I don't care what side of history you think I'm on ... I'm on the side of the truth. And climate science has been usurped by bureaucrats who want to use it to bring about global socialism. I'm not buying there is a climate crisis.

Even AOC has recently admitted that climate change is a lever of economic and social justice. And if she's figured it out, so has everyone else. Politics + science = politics. Leftists are not interested in science. They are interested in confiscating the worlds wealth, creating a new order, and then declaring themselves saviors of the planet. LOL. No thanks. I am a fan of self-determination and freedom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 11:11 AM
 
4,445 posts, read 1,448,433 times
Reputation: 3609
Quote:
Wut? The world isn't losing snow? So diminishing snow pack in the Alps is equaled by a few flakes falling in a place that doesn't normally see it? It doesn't work that way. That's utterly ridiculous. Please try to look at what you're saying.


In addition to science, you need a grammar lesson. Try looking up "future perfect" to see what you can find. It'll open up a whole world to you!
The prediction was there would be no snow in future winters. Try looking up "context" to see what you can find. Also, the comparison between the Alps and place X is all you. It's a strawman you made in order to argue a point I wasn't making.

Without the author to clarify meaning, I think it could go either way. I'm not going to quibble over this. I made the larger point and that was past climate consequence predictions have been wrong and I have zero reason to put my faith in future predictions of climate catastrophe. Cheers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,537,374 times
Reputation: 18814
Every time I see a thread like this that says Global Warming is fake due to it snowing somewhere, it just reaffirms my belief that Conservatives are really stupid when it comes to science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 11:58 AM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,111,029 times
Reputation: 5667
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Every time I see a thread like this that says Global Warming is fake due to it snowing somewhere, it just reaffirms my belief that Conservatives are really stupid when it comes to science.
“Well grandma said”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 11:58 AM
 
23,968 posts, read 15,063,270 times
Reputation: 12937
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Every time I see a thread like this that says Global Warming is fake due to it snowing somewhere, it just reaffirms my belief that Conservatives are really stupid when it comes to science.
It has been my 50 year observation that they were more concerned with high school football and cheerleaders than science class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 12:02 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
It has been my 50 year observation that they were more concerned with high school football and cheerleaders than science class.
It shows, they’re all dumb as stumps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 12:15 PM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,161,497 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50 View Post
The prediction was there would be no snow in future winters.
Link to a reputable scientist who wrote or said this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50 View Post
past climate consequence predictions have been wrong
"The First Climate Model Turns 50, And Predicted Global Warming Almost Perfectly" -- Forbes

"Can We Trust Climate Models? Increasingly, the Answer is ‘Yes’" -- Yale University
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 12:48 PM
 
4,445 posts, read 1,448,433 times
Reputation: 3609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Well, the quote I used was reported as being from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 2 Sept 2008. But oddly enough, they don't keep a running or current list of their failed climate predictions on their web site. Might have something to do with people financing them. Anyway, any scientist that would report something outside of your beliefs would likely be considered unreputable by you in the first place. so what's the point?

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000."

Funny thing, that document is gone too. It's almost like there was an effort to scrub the internet of materials that can be used to point out these failed examples of climate fear-mongering.

I guess your point is that if it's not on the internet and authored by a scientist you agree with, then it didn't happen. My point is that here in 2019 is that kids know what snow is and winters are still snowy and icy and I don't believe there is an existential climate crisis at all. Cheers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2019, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,219,897 times
Reputation: 3925
It doesn't really matter. Most people would love to drive a slick, affordable, performant electric car, but none EXISTS! No government policy is going to speed that process up. The Earth will adapt no matter what the climate does. Just live your life and stop acting like you really care if the temp is 1 degree higher in 100 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top