Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:31 PM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,253,078 times
Reputation: 7764

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Moving the goalposts, eh?
Nope, my post was clear. I think you just misread it. It's obvious that 68 was Nixon's first election, and 16 was Trump's first election, and predictions about the corresponding re-election clearly equate 72 with 20.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:33 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Please, please, please run McGovern 2.0!

Find one and I would do so happily!

Wanna compare McGovern's war record with Trump's?





Oh! One of them has none!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:38 PM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,253,078 times
Reputation: 7764
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Oh! One of them has none!
Man, you're more exposed than the Oscars streaker.

He doesn't have a record because he wasn't elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:56 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,674,856 times
Reputation: 14050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Sorry if you want Watergate 2.0, you need to endure McGovern 2.0. Get your story straight!

Also Nixon was the start of a run of Republicans winning 5 out of 6 presidential elections, ending the Keynesian consensus, stagflation, and the Soviet Union.

Be careful what you wish for.
You'd have to opine that the American public was still in the same place as 1972...which it certainly is not by most measurements.

It's easy to compare crooks...single crooks or a couple of them.

A LOT harder to compare the entire populace of the nation and where society has progressed to.

Do you think, for example, that legal pot and same-sex unions would have floated in 1972? I rest my case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 09:05 PM
 
1,991 posts, read 900,502 times
Reputation: 2627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Man, you're more exposed than the Oscars streaker.

He doesn't have a record because he wasn't elected.
What are you going on about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 09:30 PM
 
4,540 posts, read 2,784,951 times
Reputation: 4921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Sorry if you want Watergate 2.0, you need to endure McGovern 2.0. Get your story straight!

Also Nixon was the start of a run of Republicans winning 5 out of 6 presidential elections, ending the Keynesian consensus, stagflation, and the Soviet Union.

Be careful what you wish for.
Actually, you're completely wrong on Keynesian economics. Behavioral Keynesian economics laid out the foundation for explorations of wage rigidity and unemployment. By that time everyone knew neoclassical theory was deeply flawed.

Look at 2008, Europe chose austerity, we chose Keynesian theory. We've ended up way better off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top