Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Like I said, that's not all the evidence that's needed - you would also need evidence of "gross negligence". Under your criteria, every incidence of spillage would be prosecutable as treason. Which is, on its face, ridiculous.
Good for DOJ. They recognize treason is a higher crime then lazy.
Trump and his Republicans are trying, with their allegience to Russia and Americas money...to overthrow American democracy. Treason. Who, by the way , call the Constitution ridiculous and stupid.
Hillary sent emails from home instead of going to work.
Good for DOJ. They recognize treason is a higher crime then lazy.
Trump and his Republicans are trying, with their allegience to Russia and Americas money...to overthrow American democracy. Treason. Who, by the way , call the Constitution ridiculous and stupid.
Hillary sent emails from home instead of going to work.
You're either delusional or purposely trolling, possibly both.
Their conversations went beyond political opinion, way beyond. Maybe to plotting a way - ahem, Watergate? - to prevent a political candidate from being elected, to even participating in a back alley coup.
That is more like what they colluded about in their plethora of txts.
If you have some subsequent action they took I would like to hear it. Claims that there were secret meetings which I believe was a call for happy hour are laughable.
Like I said, that's not all the evidence that's needed - you would also need evidence of "gross negligence". Under your criteria, every incidence of spillage would be prosecutable as treason. Which is, on its face, ridiculous.
Don't go nuts over this, it wasn't about treason.
Despite the plain language of the law, which as you point out says 'grossnegligence,' Comey/DOJ concluded they have to prove 'intent.' That's why how Comey came to use the phrase extremelycareless instead of grossnegligence is suspicious, to some.
Despite the plain language of the law, which as you point out says 'grossnegligence,' Comey/DOJ concluded they have to prove 'intent.' That's why how Comey came to use the phrase extremelycareless instead of grossnegligence is suspicious, to some.
*I* know and understand that. momonkey on the other hand.....
Ok, I think I have the gist of this...Hillary’s use of a unprotected email server was bad, but Trump’s use of a unprotected iPhone is no big deal. Got it.
It's a public facing email server with the IP listed in the MX record that must accept connections if you expect standard email delivery. If you want an example of the lack of security there was admin login that should of minimally been firewalled off except for known IP's, ideally only accessible from internal connections. This is security 101 for public facing server.
Again - You could send it emails. So what? You need to penetrate the system and gain administrator status.
A small system is difficult. Unusual traffic shows and the system is easily viewed to see if anything is going on. The system was professionally operated.
Would I be shocked if it were penetrated? Of course not. But the best evidence is that it was not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
