Why would you NOT impeach a President who colluded..? (ethical, CNN, polls)

[TomC23]

Originally Posted by bawac34618

I think Trump's base is more than relevant. If anything, they are all that matters and yes, I would say we are in the beginning of a banana republic at best.

I guess I have more confidence in our country than you do.

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

When spineless corrupt senate Pubs would vote to leave him in office.

Next easy question, please.

Did not stop the Republican House majority from voting to impeach Clinton, knowing full well the Senate was not going to play ball.

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by craigiri

It wouldn't be a crime for Trump to film and sell Stormy Daniels and he in the Oval Office in their birthday suits.

But I'd say impeach if he did.

So long as he does not lie about it.....

[Buckeye77]

Originally Posted by craigiri

Landing craft?

I would list the thousands of Trump lies and BS, but they won't fit so your list will have to suffice for Landing Craft or whatever you have in your mind.

lol - yep, you caught me in a typo & I'll give myself 40 lashes. Glad to know you can't challenge the rest of the post.

LWLT =>> Left Wing Loony Toon.

[oceangaia]

Originally Posted by trobesmom

Colluded with a hostile government to interfere in the outcome of the election. And no, I don't know how that is done. And no, I don't know that Trump could be charged with collusion. But I do know Trump is looking awfully good for obstruction, financial fraud and a few other things. Whether or not any of that pans out remains to be seen.

If you don't know how it was done then you don't know that it was done at all.

[CraigCreek]

Originally Posted by oceangaia

If you don't know how it was done then you don't know that it was done at all.

So, then do you know how it was done? If not, then perhaps you don't know that it didn't happen.

I don't have full knowledge of a lot of things, but that doesn't mean that they didn't happen.

[craigiri]

Originally Posted by Buckeye77

lol - yep, you caught me in a typo & I'll give myself 40 lashes. Glad to know you can't challenge the rest of the post.

LWLT =>> Left Wing Loony Toon.

As long as you understand that only you know what you are talking about then all is well.

Don't imagine that everyone reads the web sites or echos the same words at you do.....

I'm still looking for those Single Jewish Women. It's as if the people who make up these codes don't realize that SJW stood for that in personal ads for 50 years!

Maybe "white" stands for "What Hell I Thought Entailed" or something like that?

Better to actually explain in words what one is getting at.

[Buckeye77]

Originally Posted by craigiri

As long as you understand that only you know what you are talking about then all is well.

Don't imagine that everyone reads the web sites or echos the same words at you do.....

I'm still looking for those Single Jewish Women. It's as if the people who make up these codes don't realize that SJW stood for that in personal ads for 50 years!

Maybe "white" stands for "What Hell I Thought Entailed" or something like that?

Better to actually explain in words what one is getting at.

Cool story, but irrelevant. And once again you have shown you can't dispute my post.

Thanks for you support.

[jazzarama]

Originally Posted by burdell

I don't seek legal advice from any political groups.

You should try looking for info from non-political people who know something about what 'high crimes and misdemeanors' means. It isn't limited to criminal acts.

[phantompilot]

There isn't any such crime. Go look at "collusion" in the USC. You'll see none of it applies to something the POTUS could do, or even as a candidate.