Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-24-2019, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in Florida
231 posts, read 156,471 times
Reputation: 281

Advertisements

Trump was correct all along.


A total witch hunt made up by Obama and Clinton to steal our election.


Trump continues to destroy the anti American left.

 
Old 03-24-2019, 09:37 PM
 
Location: plano
7,891 posts, read 11,410,931 times
Reputation: 7799
Illegal to use dossier, false claims, to get access.

You claim it's legal to listen to duly elected president talking to Russians? I don't trust the deep state to use any confidential information from president to not use it to undermine him and half of the citizens. Senior FBI and Don officials were doing their best to undermine not for valid reasons just because of their bias. I bet you think you are not biased too. I don't agree Russians talking to a precious elect should be legal with the hate many iof those we pay have for trump.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,662,744 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57 View Post
Of all the comments I've read, the best one was along the lines that some folks seem to be under the impression that Barr's four pages to Congress is a full book report on the investigation when in fact it's more like an Amazon review.
Good point.
With his own opinion pieced in also.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in Florida
231 posts, read 156,471 times
Reputation: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnhw2 View Post
Illegal to use dossier, false claims, to get access.

You claim it's legal to listen to duly elected president talking to Russians? I don't trust the deep state to use any confidential information from president to not use it to undermine him and half of the citizens. Senior FBI and Don officials were doing their best to undermine not for valid reasons just because of their bias. I bet you think you are not biased too. I don't agree Russians talking to a precious elect should be legal with the hate many iof those we pay have for trump.



Wait, they forgot it was Obama on a hit mic who told Putin and his people we can work with you after the election. They did, sold them our uranium.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 09:45 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
7,709 posts, read 5,456,509 times
Reputation: 16244
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
I sure wish I had the $$$$ that were wasted on this witch hunt.
I wish our country's treasury had all the back taxes that the Cheater-in-Chief hasn't disclosed or paid.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Avignon, France
11,160 posts, read 7,964,064 times
Reputation: 28966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Right. Trump said to Lavrov and Kislyak about firing "nut job" Comey: "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off." How Barr could objectively conclude Trump was not chargeable with obstruction is beyond me.
Apparently he knows the law better than you....
 
Old 03-24-2019, 10:06 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Now to the blatant violations of the 4th Amendment.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 10:07 PM
 
3,594 posts, read 1,793,885 times
Reputation: 4726
Are any of you leftists embarrassed by this? You accused him of Treason, something that is punishable by death in most countries. 2 years of nonstop harping on Russian collusion by 90% of our mainstream media without any evidence that he did it or was even being investigated for it. This was the biggest conspiracy theory in American history.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 10:29 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,527,813 times
Reputation: 14945
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
If it's senseless, the GOP should have no issues with the FULL REPORT RELEASE. Otherwise, the Individual 1 appointee Barr, who wrote a memo against obstruction of a president a year ago AND appointed by individual 1 based on that opinion, can't be trusted to provide a detailed and accurate summary of the obstruction case. Of course, Individual 1 has a history of appointing corrupt and dishonest hacks! The American people trust Mueller who couldn't come to a conclusion on obstruction. There was EVIDENCE of obstruction but did it rise to the level of a crime? Democrats need to demand the Mueller report, not the Barr summary.
Ask Mueller if he thinks that Barr is a corrupt and dishonest hack. I'd bet the answer would be no.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 10:34 PM
 
18,088 posts, read 15,670,593 times
Reputation: 26794
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
I don't understand the point to this thread...???
He nor his supporters understand the election is long over and has been.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top