Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:01 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave Stranger View Post
They are going to be gobsmacked when the Huber & Horowitz reports are released & Brennan & Comey & Page & Stroke & Baker & Clapper are all called out. These collusion truthers think if they post this garbage enough it's going to mean something.
I'm fine with it all coming out, Dem, Rep, FBI, whatever. If there's collusion on either side, let it be exposed.

 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:04 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Oh, now doubt, there are people in denial....you have written your posts, have you understood what you wrote?. For 2+ years there were people who 100% absolutely knew trump was guilty. Now that he was found not, here you are....killing it, that he is guilty, damn the evidence...
You tell me of any post where I said Trump was guilty. Any. Post. I said let the Mueller investigation be completed and we will see what we will see.

FYI, I do think Trump is guilty. And I believe Mueller when he says he doesn't exonerate Trump for obstruction of justice. So there is that.
 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:05 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
What Barr released was a summary of the “principle conclusions”
Basically its just the outcome of the investigation, like looking at the final score of a baseball game rather than a play by play.


The democrats took that to mean a summary of the entire investigation..that was incorrect.

It wasnt a summary of the details leading up to outcome.
It wasnt a summary of methods that lead to the outcome.
It wasnt a summary of questions asked to witnesses.
It was just a summary of the final outcome

The report isnt going to change that final outcome , it is just going to allow people to see the details and how that outcome was reached.

At the end of day Barr is the AG and his decision is what counts and its still going to be no collusion, no obstruction, no conspiracy, no crime....and Trump will still be your president.

Lol
Fortunately, Mueller's investigation wasn't and isn't the only one going on. Hopefully we'll get to see the results of those as well.
 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:07 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
Who was it that said "elections have consequences"........
Yes they do, and now we are getting the House investigations that we should have been getting for the last two years.
 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:29 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,434,864 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
So Barr will risk his career and reputation to misrepresent Mueller’s report?
.as Micheal Cohen shakes his head sadly with a low muttering of I told You So.

Another Coverup
Another Catch and Kill
More Obstruction.

Lock up AG Barr for Obstruction of Justice
He is compromised and cannot be trusted to tell the truth.
He intentionally allowed the traitor in the WH to announce to the world he was exonerated..when HE KNEW IT WAS FALSE.
LOCK HIM UP.

DO IT CONGRESS
 
Old 03-30-2019, 07:49 PM
 
18,425 posts, read 8,256,472 times
Reputation: 13757
"Under the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach a government official, in effect serving as prosecutor. The Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge. Since 1789 the Senate has tried seventeen federal officials, including two presidents."
 
Old 03-30-2019, 08:06 PM
 
Location: 20 years from now
6,454 posts, read 7,006,642 times
Reputation: 4663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
...and somehow you think all your bullet points count...like in over 2 years Mueller never heard of any of them
The bullet points were a terrible misinterpretation of the facts, and the poster conflates "Russian tampering" with "Trump collusion" as if they were one in the same by mixing and matching "facts" and speculation and they just end up confusing themselves. I don't think anyone here has refuted that there was "Russian "interference" in the election (but let's not confuse that with why the election was won by Trump); what people doubt is the collusion end of it, especially when such a lengthy or costly investigation was conducted and finalized at the highest levels of the Feds stating that it in fact did not happen.
 
Old 03-30-2019, 08:25 PM
 
18,557 posts, read 7,361,047 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Yes they do, and now we are getting the House investigations that we should have been getting for the last two years.
Investigations into what? Democrats criticized Nunes wildly for not investigating something that he knew didn't happen.
 
Old 03-30-2019, 09:02 PM
 
15,580 posts, read 15,650,878 times
Reputation: 21960
Default No "Exoneration"

Interesting impeachment comparison:



What this outcome is not, however, is a “Complete and Total EXONERATION,” as Mr. Trump unsurprisingly spun it. Mr. Mueller explicitly declined to exonerate the president on the matter of obstruction of justice — a crime that constituted one of the articles of impeachment for both Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. After examining Mr. Trump’s actions and weighing “difficult issues” of law and fact, Mr. Mueller punted. “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” the report states.

We know that the Russian government interfered repeatedly in the 2016 presidential election, by hacking into computer servers of the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign. We know that it did this with the goals of dividing Americans and helping Donald Trump win the presidency. We know that when top members of the Trump campaign learned about this interference, they didn’t just fail to report it to the F.B.I. They welcomed it. They encouraged it. They made jokes about it. On the same day that Mr. Trump publicly urged the Russians to hack into Hillary Clinton’s emails, they began to do just that. And we know that when questioned by federal authorities, many of Mr. Trump’s top associates lied, sometimes repeatedly, about their communications with Russians. None of this is in dispute.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/24/o...stigation.html
 
Old 03-30-2019, 09:05 PM
 
18,557 posts, read 7,361,047 times
Reputation: 11372
He wasn't investigated for obstruction of justice, so it's irrelevant to the question of exoneration. The investigation was about collusion, the investigator found no collusion, and Trump was thus exonerated.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top