Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Failure to be concerned that at heart the president of this country is a scofflaw, crook, liar, philanderer, bully, charlatan, hater and disrespecter of all our institutions, basically he hates the Constitution and prefers the politics of Putin to ours, is a sad indictment at how low this country has fallen.
Trump's sewer morality and ethics are the new normal. SAD.
Just thought I'd put this back out here for you - full-on, terminal TDS. Nothing to do with the Mueller report or 2 year investigation or fact finding. Just a mindless rant about "orange man bad". And all you LWLTs say amen to it.
So the least of our national security issues is Congress reading the report that team Mueller produced.
Below is part of Barr's testimony that doesn't yolk together. A summary is actually what Barr released. He drafted a summary for the public instead of releasing Mueller's summaries. Now he is saying that wasn't his intention. He can't be trusted just like the rest of Individual 1's corrupt circle.
Quote:
Asked about the Times’ reporting on frustrations among some of Mr. Mueller’s investigators about the narrow scope of his letter laying out their findings, Mr. Barr appeared unswayed.
“I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize,” Mr. Barr said, “because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once.”
Each page of the report was marked that it might contain secret grand jury material and could not be readily released anyway, he said. He also said he had asked the intelligence community to review the report for any information that might compromise their sources and methods of intelligence-gathering and would thus need to be redacted.
Obviously, you don't know what a summary means when someone summarizes a report and mentions what they summarized in the summary.
READ: The Justice Department's Summary Of The Mueller Report
Quote:
During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel's report.
Mueller wrote lengthy summaries of his own for public viewing that Barr didn't release. Why would Barr need Mueller to confirm/review another summary? It doesn't make sense for Barr to come to his own conclusion.
To the bold, barr is not coming up with his own conclusion.....he is coming up with what he is provided, and evidently, mueller did not want to review it because it was almost the same thing he stated....nothing....
Obviously, you don't know what a summary means when someone summarizes a report and mentions what they summarized in the summary.
READ: The Justice Department's Summary Of The Mueller Report
During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel's report.
Did you really just say, the summary is not a summary because they wrote a summary and summarized what was in the report? Yes, why yes you did....
Obviously, you don't know what a summary means when someone summarizes a report and mentions what they summarized in the summary.
READ: The Justice Department's Summary Of The Mueller Report
"During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel's report."
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 Obviously, you don't know what a summary means when someone summarizes a report and mentions what they summarized in the summary.
READ: The Justice Department's Summary Of The Mueller Report
"During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel's report."
Sounds like a summary to me. What else could it be?
Ouch.....a leftist going after a leftist......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
