Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
CNN: democratic presidential front runner caught on video murdering someone.
Democrats: let’s see the video.
Police: sorry. Under the keep-children-safe act of 2026, that video is censored. Just take our word for it.
Youtube won't even let you talk about the idea that this might be fake. They dismantled their filters so you can't bypass any of the MSM propaganda. I had to go to Bing to find some things, and I found one video so far where a guy is just talking about the incident. No footage at all. And youtube, while letting video play, disabled the comments, like/dislike, views and sharing options. Trobesmom, maybe you are all for some kind of dictatorship where we must be obedient little robots and never question authority, but I will never be that kind of person, and I have a serious problem where someone can't even discuss the shooting on their private channel, it's all main stream news media. So, all of this sends up huge red flags that there is something wrong with this, they don't want the regular people to view these videos because they will know we will poke holes into this BS story.
Or what they call "an objectionable publication". Yes, they are actually going to imprison people for spreading public information that they don't want the public to see. Even possessing the video is a crime.
This is where censorship leads if you allow it. In the US, this would be called "common sense speech control".
Possessing child pornography is a crime in the US. Should that be allowed too? If we follow your logic, child pornography, rape and exploitation should be freely available with no penalty. Do you think it should be, is that free speech? Or like this video, is committing a crime on tape and then using that to profit from, in this case pushing the shooter’s agenda, ok? Do you think people should be allowed to profit from releasing actual heinous crimes on tape?
And why do you have any right to watch such a thing, just because it got out into the public square before it could be stopped? Don’t the people who were murdered have the right to die without being watched by a bunch of morbid, sick viewers?
So, I guess you think the mother of Emmett Till was wrong for wanting a glass casket so people can see the evil that was done to her innocent son? Everybody has different ways of coping with horrible things. Some prefer to stick their heads in the sand. Some want to face the violence head on. What I do know is, censorship like this does more harm than good, because the videos bring out discussions. And that is the first step in trying to wrap our heads around this.
Yes, I agree with you, its important that they allow people to see the video, just like US media did when the Columbine school shooting happened, they were playing video from the schools surv system, where it was obvious the boys involved, were doing these things....its important for people to see proof of that happening.
Like usual, we normal, sane folks just can't rationalize how 1 demented individual could manage to callously and viciously murder so many people all by his lonesome.
...so we concoct stupid conspiracy theories and "credit" the bastard for being a movie-worthy supervillain and/or the event being the work of a complex black-op or something similar.
Truth is, some people are just psychopaths who can kill without a problem and it's easy to "shoot fish in a barrel" and rack up a high body count. That doesn't take talent or skill... just a sick mind and a will to do anything to advance your agenda.
The world has never been a totally safe place and it never will be. It will be even more dangerous if we disarm the good people of the world however... humanity will always produce monsters and if we make it impossible for good to resist and fight back, the monsters will eventually take over.
Are you confused as to the details of what happened in NZ?
Now you are just being obtuse. You know that it was an analogy and a damned good one at that.
What is the value of broadcasting endless loops? None. The story is out there.. What is the harm? If feeds the trolls and other would be shooters. It also satisfies the ghouls who enjoy looking at an accident scene. The more blood the better.
Yes, I agree with you, its important that they allow people to see the video, just like US media did when the Columbine school shooting happened, they were playing video from the schools surv system, where it was obvious the boys involved, were doing these things....its important for people to see proof of that happening.
That is actually a different scenario. The school surveillance system was not an active participant in the murders.
Tarrant’s livestream is part of the atrocity being commited. He wanted people to see it. Watching it is somewhat like being an accessory.
Youtube won't even let you talk about the idea that this might be fake. They dismantled their filters so you can't bypass any of the MSM propaganda. I had to go to Bing to find some things, and I found one video so far where a guy is just talking about the incident. No footage at all. And youtube, while letting video play, disabled the comments, like/dislike, views and sharing options. Trobesmom, maybe you are all for some kind of dictatorship where we must be obedient little robots and never question authority, but I will never be that kind of person, and I have a serious problem where someone can't even discuss the shooting on their private channel, it's all main stream news media. So, all of this sends up huge red flags that there is something wrong with this, they don't want the regular people to view these videos because they will know we will poke holes into this BS story.
I don't suspect fakery. Although the fact they were they all piled up in the corners of the room, that seemed a little odd, but I don't really have any reference point - the "authorities" have managed to suppress any footage or official crime scene photos of nearly every mass shooting that has ever occurred, including the ones that DO seem rife with fakery.
I just heard that Pakistan is a favorite country of the shooter after China. Explains a lot.
Anyone think this guy was hypnotized? Before the killing began an odd bit of folk music started playing in his car. Post hypnotic suggestion? I have a feeling he will be 'Oswalded' while in custody to keep him from talking. I doubt he was a lone wolf.
Get back to us when the police in the USA make a blanket statement that anyone caught with this video will face more than a decade in jail.
Case closed on that.
Let's go up-forum a bit and read the threads on people being detained in the U.S. for simply speaking Spanish. Or how about the one where your president is calling for investigation of SNL for comedians hurting his wee feewings.
Or, we could just go with the cops in the U.S. killing more unarmed people than any other country out there but hey, somebody dead can't complain about their rights being usurped, eh?
Yeah, the case is closed all right. You people are off the wall goofy with your faux superiority of rights nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
