Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
People who do these killings are terrorists no matter which side 5hey are on. One does not excuse the other and the fact that they might be doing it under the guise of religion is even more disgusting.
As for not being able to find any stories on CNN regarding the alleged radicalization of terrorists at the New Zealand mosque, there are two obvious answers. At best, it's unconfirmed information and responsible news organizations are taking the time necessary to get their facts straight, or that it's total bull****. Only time will tell. I know you're heartbroken because you rilly, rilly, rilly want it to be true so you can cut the stories out and paste them in your little scrapbook, but you're just going to have to wait a day or two and see how it develops.
You mean the same "responsible news organisations" that got their facts straight concerning the Covington students and the lying Stolen Valor Indian? Or that promoted the Smollett story? The Buzzfeed hoax? All within just the last 2-3 months? The MSM does NOT care about fact-they care about pushing an agenda.
9 mil hits on the church bombings....236 million on the mosque shootings. Yeah-"fair and balanced".
I do kind of get it. Islamists killing Christians happens so often it isn't even news and barely warrants reporting. Islamists being the victims of anyone BUT other Islamists is so rare that it IS newsworthy.
It's either that-or there is a deliberate effort to distort the truth.
Give me a break. Your leader, the most high Barak Obama - called a terrorist attack by a Muslim at Fort Hood TX - a workplace violence incident. A terrorist attack by Muslims in Libya was tried to be passed off as an incident that was incited by a video - instead of being called what it was - a Muslim terrorist attack.
The terrorist attack was first believed to have been carried out by terrorists incited by a video. I don`t see what the problem was other than HRC was Secretary of State and a 2 decades long FOX news target. It was never said that the attack was carried out by goat herders, school children, tourists, the PTA, etc. What should we call an attack like the one the MAGA Coast Guard officer was plotting 2 weeks ago? Would we have called him a terrorist or a poor guy in need of his meds?
The terrorist attack was first believed to have been carried out by terrorists incited by a video. I don`t see what the problem was other than HRC was Secretary of State and a 2 decades long FOX news target. It was never said that the attack was carried out by goat herders, school children, tourists, the PTA, etc. What should we call an attack like the one the MAGA Coast Guard officer was plotting 2 weeks ago? Would we have called him a terrorist or a poor guy in need of his meds?
Bunk. Clinton herself discussed the fact that the slaughter of 4 Americans was NOT "over a video" with her family, and with foreign leaders, the very night it happened. Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice lied repeatedly to the American people for weeks after this happened. Long after the truth was known. And the lie was perpetuated by a biased "debate moderator" from IIRC NBC. Every effort was made to suppress the truth until after the elections-and then just ignore and bury it.
You mean the same "responsible news organisations" that got their facts straight concerning the Covington students and the lying Stolen Valor Indian? Or that promoted the Smollett story? The Buzzfeed hoax? All within just the last 2-3 months? The MSM does NOT care about fact-they care about pushing an agenda.
How would you know? You've already proven right here in this thread that you don't pay any attention to them.
9 mil hits on the church bombings....236 million on the mosque shootings. Yeah-"fair and balanced".
I do kind of get it. Islamists killing Christians happens so often it isn't even news and barely warrants reporting. Islamists being the victims of anyone BUT other Islamists is so rare that it IS newsworthy.
It's either that-or there is a deliberate effort to distort the truth.
You act like 9 million hits is a very little number of hits. This obviously has more to do with NZ being a commonwealth country and having essentially the same google as the U.S. Also NZ happened a few days ago and was a heavily internet involved story. The shooter used the web extensively, while this attack happened in an isolated region of the Phillipines even and was t Facebook lived, didn’t have Twitter involve or 8chan. Look up Paris Attack and see how many hits happens. Your just angry that someone who espouses similar views to you decided to act on it and Muslims haven’t been killing that many westerners as of late so you can’t rant about them. I wouldn’t be surprised if the next terrorist attack in the west happened made you happy so you could rant about how Muslims are evil.
Disgusting. People are just horrible. I don’t care what religion they are. And you doing this tit for tat nonsense is also disgusting.
The poor people in NZ, the four year old boy shot in the face, had nothing to do with ISIS, and WERE an inncocent victims. As was the father who carried that baby out of the mosque, and the British man who covered the face of the girl with half her head missing and two bullets in her back.
Disgusting that you would insinuate that they deserved it because of the actions of other people in a different universe. Can’t you people see that that’s why all this horror prevails??
The media is selective in their reporting. Pointing it out is necessary and appropriate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.