Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think a lot of people fall in the middle and see the value of being free to make decision based on a wide variety of factors. For instance there are many who may decide to get most vaccines but then forgo others. I just hope the people who value the ability to choose will speak up because that right is being eroded state by state, day by day.
Thank you! To me it's not all black and white. I want to choose...and I choose not to get the flu vaccine...ever.
Side effects rare? Hardly. Billions of dollars paid out to those that have experienced 'rare' side effects.
There is a special court system set up specifically to deal with side effect lawsuits.
There is a tax/fee/whatever you want to call it on each vaccine specifically to pay for all the anticipated SETTLEMENTS from the lawsuits prompted by the side effects that they know are going to occur.They've prepared for all the lawsuits from the 'rare' side effects.They know the side effects will occur.
They know they will be sued. The manufacturers have been removed from the responsibility and set up a great little system to pay for it.
Rare? Nope. Not even close.
Then could you please cite the evidence and statistics that show vaccine side effects are not rare?
The Supreme Court disagrees with you. The Tribunal was set up because the cases are so rare.
"...Federal law protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits by parents who claim that vaccines harmed their children, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday....
"The court ruled 6 to 2 that going before a special tribunal set up by Congress is the only way parents can be compensated for the negative side effects that in rare instances accompany vaccinations...."
I have seen no one - in this thread or in the real world - advocating for mandatory flu shots.
I guess it doesn't happen then...and no one wants to ban guns or restrict the first ammendment either...okay, go back in your bubble.
So, you deny this exists?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endoplasmic
Pro vaccine - because I understand science in general and immunology in particular. Pro-mandatory vaccine - because it is important to protect those with a real inability to get some vaccines (medial only, none of this personal choice, religious choice BS)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.