Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you Anti-Vaxxer or Pro-Vaxxer and why?
Anti-Vaxxer 20 12.42%
Pro-Vaxxer 141 87.58%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2019, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,195 posts, read 5,723,533 times
Reputation: 12342

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo48 View Post
I do not want any medical care/ treatment whatsoever. Not my right as an adult? OT but I wanted to get a DNR and bracelet. Husband asked HIS doctor about that. "She will have to come see me and we talk about it". Go, suck an egg on that. Why should an adult need a DOCTOR to sign a DNR form? I will go to an ATTORNEY before going to any Doctor. Trust them more than you people.
While I agree that you should not need to talk to a doctor about getting a DNR, if you need to in order to have it honored, then not doing so would mean it isn't honored, wouldn't it? If you need a medical professional to sign off on it, maybe you can just stop into the hospital or even the health dept and get it done? It seems to me that you could just order a bracelet that says "DNR" and wear it, though I don't know if that would be honored without any official paperwork... I don't know anything about it, those are just thoughts.

Anyway, I don't think "mandated" for adults actually means mandated. I think it more means that you wouldn't be able to work in certain places. I don't have that type of a job (public health, teaching, etc) and nobody has ever asked me about vaccines other than my own doctor and, in the case of the flu shot, my daughter's cardiologist (because she is high risk for the flu and they recommend -- not mandate -- that everyone in her household gets it each year). Although I am careful about vaccinations and don't take everything they offer, I would be perfectly fine with a hospital insisting that the employees get flu shots. Don't want a flu shot? Don't work there. I'd also be cool with a school having the same rule for employees.

 
Old 03-18-2019, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,105 posts, read 41,238,832 times
Reputation: 45124
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
Obesity, drinking, and smoking are the main risk factors for pretty much everything.

I guess employers have a right to not hire fat people, alcoholics or smokers too.

Maybe they should scour medical records for every drug a doctor wanted someone to take that they didn't, every surgery that was recommended that people didn't have, every well visit that was missed. Maybe they could take a look at all pharmacy records, check all the refills, make sure people were taking all their drugs.

Freedom.

Some people really have no idea what it means.
Your "freedom" ends where it encroaches on another person's freedom. I think you are the one who does not understand that "freedom" doe not mean you may do whatever you want to do with no regard for the effect it might have on other people.

Employers already can refuse to hire smokers. They can fire people for excessive drinking, which often impacts absenteeism and may be problematic for those who do work related driving or operate machinery.

Many employers underwrite wellness programs to promote a healthy weight, including gym memberships. So do insurance companies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by animalcrazy View Post
Vaccines are necessary and measles are on the rise because of people not vaccinating their children. I was forced to be vaccinated for flu every year at work or I would be terminated. I resented it because the flu vaccine was only 50% effective on some years and there are risks with the vaccine. I haven't taken a flu shot since I retired 4 years ago and I haven't had the flu either. If they could make more effective like 90% I would take a flu shot every year. The measles vaccine is around 90% effective with one dose and 97% effective with two doses according to the CDC. I would vaccinate my child if I had one.
What risks with flu vaccine? Why is a 50 to 60% effectiveness (in most years) not worth taking the vaccine for?

By the way, 80% of children who die from flu are not vaccinated.
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:23 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,735,487 times
Reputation: 19118
Suzy, you said “your freedom ends where it encroaches on another person’s freedom”. You also claim in in one breath that everyone has a choice when it comes to vaccines yet in the next talk about limits to employment, getting driver’s licenses, paying fines, not being able to go to school (public or private) if one refuses vaccines which seriously limits a persons ability to even make a living or live life.

Are you and others who push these extremes not able to understand that your “freedom” to not come into contact with anyone who hasn’t been vaccinated ends when the cost is forcing others to give up their freedom through coercion to get forgo a medical intervention, an injection aka a vaccine against their will (because otherwise they lose the ability to work, drive, pay bills, get an education)?

Last edited by MissTerri; 03-18-2019 at 06:39 PM..
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:32 PM
 
10,226 posts, read 6,312,506 times
Reputation: 11287
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Suzy, you said “your freedom ends where it encroaches on another person’s freedom. You also claim in in one breath that everyone has a choice when it comes to vaccines yet in the next talk about limits to employment, getting driver’s licenses, paying fines, not being able to go to school (public or private) if one refuses vaccines which seriously limits a persons ability to even make a living or live life.

Are you and others who push these extremes not able to understand that your “freedom” to not come into contact with anyone who hasn’t been vaccinated ends when the cost is forcing others to give up their freedom through coercion to get forgo a medical intervention, an injection aka a vaccine against their will (because otherwise they lose the ability to work, drive, pay bills, get an education)?
The bottom line is that they fear their vaccinations won't work so they need to force their vaccinated Herd Immunity. Those of us who are old and had these diseases ourselves do not fear the unvaccinated because we trust our own natural immunity to prevent us from catching these diseases AGAIN. If someone is immune, they cannot spread it to others. I will include in this all those who have had measles in these outbreaks in Disney, Minnesota, and now Washington. How many have DIED??? These people will never need to get vaccinated, or will give others measles.

I will repeat that I am Pro Choice. Get as many as you want, but if you trust in your vaccinations then why do you worry about the unvaccinated? Isn't that the purpose of your vaccines? To prevent you from getting the disease in the first place?
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,354,720 times
Reputation: 14459
Whatever the State decides is fine by me. It knows all.

 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:45 PM
 
30,059 posts, read 18,656,690 times
Reputation: 20868
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
Pro. Vaccines are the single most life saving discovery in medicine of all time.
Vaccinations have been very helpful in eliminating such horrible diseases as small pox and polio.


However, I would offer that indoor plumbing has saved more lives than medical science.
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,105 posts, read 41,238,832 times
Reputation: 45124
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Suzy, you said “your freedom ends where it encroaches on another person’s freedom. You also claim in in one breath that everyone has a choice when it comes to vaccines yet in the next talk about limits to employment, getting driver’s licenses, paying fines, not being able to go to school (public or private) if one refuses vaccines which seriously limits a persons ability to even make a living or live life.

Are you and others who push these extremes not able to understand that your “freedom” to not come into contact with anyone who hasn’t been vaccinated ends when the cost is forcing others to give up their freedom through coercion to get forgo a medical intervention, an injection aka a vaccine against their will (because otherwise they lose the ability to work, drive, pay bills, get an education)?
You choose another job and choose another route to an education. I have no idea what you mean about driver's licenses. I have never discussed those at all.

The only "fine" I have discussed is penalizing those who do not vaccinate through health insurance premiums. However, I also do like the Australian approach of denying certain income tax breaks to families that do not vaccinate their children. They have now added a monthly fine to that.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8428596.html

The bottom line is that there is no valid reason not to vaccinate your healthy child in the absence of a medical contraindication. The ant-vaccinationists enormously overplay the risks of vaccines and pretty much ignore the risks of the diseases they prevent.

Sorry, the vast majority of the country vaccinates. Until you come up with a valid reason not to use a vaccine (not just that you do not want to), the rest of us would prefer not to have your children in school with ours, and many doctors will not want you in their practices, either.
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,105 posts, read 41,238,832 times
Reputation: 45124
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Vaccinations have been very helpful in eliminating such horrible diseases as small pox and polio.


However, I would offer that indoor plumbing has saved more lives than medical science.
Measles and rubella have been eliminated in the US, too. Any outbreaks now begin with an imported case.

But indoor plumbing is not "medicine".

Modern agriculture is pretty important, too. We could add Pasteurization of milk and chlorination of drinking water.
 
Old 03-18-2019, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,576 posts, read 56,463,917 times
Reputation: 23378
When I was a kid (77 years ago), I contracted actual measles, mumps and chicken pox. All the kids did. Don't recall many adults getting those diseases although people knew rubella in pregnant women was bad. However, since then (late-40s/early 50's), the US population has more than doubled and everyone is a lot more mobile.

My dad made sure my brother, sister and I got the polio vaccine as soon as it was released. We lived in fear of the iron lung in those days - every summer polio was a worry.

When my son was born in 1967, he got the usual DPT, polio and boosters. He probably got MMR in 1971 or thereabouts when it was developed as he visited his pediatrician regularly. He may have had a measles shot earlier, I don't recall any longer. I think he contracted chicken pox as a child, but not mumps or measles.

He never had any of the more recent vaccines they're pushing these days and he grew into adulthood without any issues.

My personal belief - shooting tiny babies with eight or ten different vaccines so early in life is unsafe. Period. Staggering the less critical until the kids are older - as in my son's case he was four or five when he got the MMR makes more sense.

And HPV and HepC and whatever else is being promoted these days - dangerous for tiny bodies. Why do this to an infant or toddler??

Only inoculations I've had my entire life are DPT and polio. I've never had the flu shot, but would consider pneumonia and flu shots if my health deteriorates. At the moment, I'm in great shape. Haven't even lost any height. Still 5' 11". Very careful about diet and lifestyle, however.

In short, there is a place for vaccines - but like everything else these days, there is overkill in some areas, imho.

Last edited by Ariadne22; 03-18-2019 at 07:07 PM..
 
Old 03-18-2019, 07:06 PM
 
7,076 posts, read 4,517,580 times
Reputation: 23107
Here health workers can wear masks instead of getting the flu shot. I am middle of the road with vaccines and think flu shots should be optional. I also think children’s shots should be spread out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top