Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2019, 05:50 AM
 
3,637 posts, read 1,696,722 times
Reputation: 5465

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RageX View Post
We may see our 1st female president within our lifetimes.

...but ain't a snowball's chance in hell it's gonna be Hillary!

See, any person that has ever been a child has at some point in their childhood had a teacher, or at the very least a recurring substitute teacher that was a malicious, despicable, hypocritical, condescending b--ch who reeked of disingenous insecerity. This archtype has scarred us all, some much more than others but, we all remember. See, every single one of us has met our own Hillary.

We all have ...and we all hated every second around that person.

Hillary is not just a person, an ideology or, a party. She is a primal fear or hatred that all humans share. In much the same way people loathe snakes, rats, roaches. They make us all feel, deep down in our core, disgusted.

There is not one shred of warmth, sincerity, or loyalty about her. She casts such an aura far worse than the stink of any homeless bum. Some people you can just ...feel... even around corners.

She has no redeeming qualities and, even her closest "friend" Huma Abedin, let alone any human that has ever laid eyes on her, knows it.

Those flaws you cite evidently don't disqualify someone from becoming President. The guy sitting in there right now exhibits all of those issues, plus a whole raft more...…..and he won. But, I guess, because he is a man, those are ok. If a man is like that, he is strong, if a woman is like that, she is a bit**.

And we think we have progressed so far in 2019 !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2019, 06:43 AM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,281,267 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by WMak70 View Post
Those flaws you cite evidently don't disqualify someone from becoming President. The guy sitting in there right now exhibits all of those issues, plus a whole raft more...…..and he won. But, I guess, because he is a man, those are ok. If a man is like that, he is strong, if a woman is like that, she is a bit**.

And we think we have progressed so far in 2019 !
This ain't a male / female thing. I could say all the same stuff about Chuck Schumer, except subsititute "insincere" with "creepy". He looks like he keeps a doll shelf collection of actual little girls.

...but sure, bring out the identity politics...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,331,458 times
Reputation: 5382
Quote:
Originally Posted by WMak70 View Post

Make no mistake, we WILL see a woman President in our lifetime. It is only a matter of time.
I absolutely agree with this 100%. However, the KIND of woman we see is what will determine this.

Hillary: No. Too much baggage. Too divisive. Her window of opportunity has come and gone.

Harris: Not a chance. Too smug, arrogant, and not shy about having slept her way to the top. Truly repulsive. The Anti-Trump in terms being boorish and irritating.

AOC: Not no, but hell no. Way, way too detached from reality and any thing that has any chance of flying. Maybe she'll wise up as she gets older. Only time will tell. But as she is now? Not a chance.

Warren: Geriatric version of AOC with the added bonus of being a shrill old hag. Her and Hillary need to go find a bingo game or slot machine at an Indian casino and call it a life.

My money would be on the first female POTUS being someone of the Condelezza (sp?) Rice ilk.

She would've nailed it. Black. Female. Highly educated, experienced and intelligent. Soft spoken and not offensive or in-your-face obnoxious. Respected. And relatively little controversy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 09:54 AM
 
956 posts, read 1,206,915 times
Reputation: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
I absolutely agree with this 100%. However, the KIND of woman we see is what will determine this.

Hillary: No. Too much baggage. Too divisive. Her window of opportunity has come and gone.

Harris: Not a chance. Too smug, arrogant, and not shy about having slept her way to the top. Truly repulsive. The Anti-Trump in terms being boorish and irritating.

AOC: Not no, but hell no. Way, way too detached from reality and any thing that has any chance of flying. Maybe she'll wise up as she gets older. Only time will tell. But as she is now? Not a chance.

Warren: Geriatric version of AOC with the added bonus of being a shrill old hag. Her and Hillary need to go find a bingo game or slot machine at an Indian casino and call it a life.

My money would be on the first female POTUS being someone of the Condelezza (sp?) Rice ilk.

She would've nailed it. Black. Female. Highly educated, experienced and intelligent. Soft spoken and not offensive or in-your-face obnoxious. Respected. And relatively little controversy.

I don't know what generation you are from, but AOC is loved by Millennials.


AOC is wayyyyyy too young to write her off. Who knows if she will be president....and if she will even want to run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 10:08 AM
 
33,308 posts, read 12,484,756 times
Reputation: 14897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
I absolutely agree with this 100%. However, the KIND of woman we see is what will determine this.

Hillary: No. Too much baggage. Too divisive. Her window of opportunity has come and gone.

Harris: Not a chance. Too smug, arrogant, and not shy about having slept her way to the top. Truly repulsive. The Anti-Trump in terms being boorish and irritating.

AOC: Not no, but hell no. Way, way too detached from reality and any thing that has any chance of flying. Maybe she'll wise up as she gets older. Only time will tell. But as she is now? Not a chance.

Warren: Geriatric version of AOC with the added bonus of being a shrill old hag. Her and Hillary need to go find a bingo game or slot machine at an Indian casino and call it a life.

My money would be on the first female POTUS being someone of the Condelezza (sp?) Rice ilk.

She would've nailed it. Black. Female. Highly educated, experienced and intelligent. Soft spoken and not offensive or in-your-face obnoxious. Respected. And relatively little controversy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,331,458 times
Reputation: 5382
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeHudson View Post
I don't know what generation you are from, but AOC is loved by Millennials.


AOC is wayyyyyy too young to write her off. Who knows if she will be president....and if she will even want to run.



Let's see how long that love lasts when their wish lists collide head on with the brick walls of math and reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 11:18 AM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,281,267 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
I absolutely agree with this 100%. However, the KIND of woman we see is what will determine this.

Hillary: No. Too much baggage. Too divisive. Her window of opportunity has come and gone.

Harris: Not a chance. Too smug, arrogant, and not shy about having slept her way to the top. Truly repulsive. The Anti-Trump in terms being boorish and irritating.

AOC: Not no, but hell no. Way, way too detached from reality and any thing that has any chance of flying. Maybe she'll wise up as she gets older. Only time will tell. But as she is now? Not a chance.

Warren: Geriatric version of AOC with the added bonus of being a shrill old hag. Her and Hillary need to go find a bingo game or slot machine at an Indian casino and call it a life.

My money would be on the first female POTUS being someone of the Condelezza (sp?) Rice ilk.

She would've nailed it. Black. Female. Highly educated, experienced and intelligent. Soft spoken and not offensive or in-your-face obnoxious. Respected. And relatively little controversy.
Agreed on all counts, especially Condeleeza (sp?) Rice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeHudson View Post
I don't know what generation you are from, but AOC is loved by Millennials.

AOC is wayyyyyy too young to write her off. Who knows if she will be president....and if she will even want to run.
...she wants it, she ain't been in 6 months and she already thinks she's Cobra Commander.

But wait there's more!!!

The Democrats and, their financial Soros-type sponsors are grooming her for it. She has secret service level security many congressmen never had. First Congressman or Senator that spills the beans and says anything about how she's already been picked is gonna end up with two different caliber entry wounds, in the back of the head, in the middle of a park and, have it called a suicide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2019, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,008,045 times
Reputation: 2167
Part of it was her choice as an inexperienced Robbie Mook as chief of her campaign. If you read Chasing Hillary by NYT reporter Amy Chozick, he was horrible. She should have crushed a candidate as poor as Trump. But she couldn't, even after release of the 'Access Hollywood' tape in October 2016. Most of Trump's inner circle, especially Chris Christie, believed absolutely that the campaign was toast after that.

Part was that she was pulled to the left by Bernie in the primaries. I still say Hillary had become non-ideological by the time she ran for president. When Obama asked her to be his secretary of state, she didn't ask anything about policy. Her big priority was getting her friends into state dept slots that are normally filled by the president. There are several accounts of this, including in Game Change. So her 'ideology' was loyalty to friends.

And Hillary was dinged big time by the Democratic party approach to immigration. She should have won in a 84 Reagan-style landslide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2019, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,331,458 times
Reputation: 5382
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
Hillary should have won in a 84 Reagan-style landslide.

In what parallel, alternate universe?


She's one of the most despised people in the nation, by about half the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2019, 12:15 PM
 
Location: New York
2,486 posts, read 824,042 times
Reputation: 1883
Quote:
Originally Posted by RageX View Post
Agreed on all counts, especially Condeleeza (sp?) Rice.



...she wants it, she ain't been in 6 months and she already thinks she's Cobra Commander.

But wait there's more!!!

The Democrats and, their financial Soros-type sponsors are grooming her for it. She has secret service level security many congressmen never had. First Congressman or Senator that spills the beans and says anything about how she's already been picked is gonna end up with two different caliber entry wounds, in the back of the head, in the middle of a park and, have it called a suicide.
She is absolutely being groomed for 2028 when she will be old enough to run.

Things could change, however, the Dem's all seem to be falling in line behind her. After all, in her own words "she's the boss". I think that may actually be true and THAT is scary.

The Dem's should be scratching their heads wondering how the party became such a clusterpuck.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
Let's see how long that love lasts when their wish lists collide head on with the brick walls of math and reality.
I think both parties have been sorely void of math skills. At this point for her to start pushing a 90T boondoggle power grab, though premature, is simply getting people prepared to accept it down the road.


The Dem's are a rudderless ship of fools who are throwing buckets of crap at the wall to see what sticks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top