Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-04-2019, 05:34 PM
 
1,203 posts, read 835,762 times
Reputation: 1391

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MnM258 View Post
NY + CA is what, not even 20% of the US electorate? There's no way any candidate could ever win based on support just in those two states, even if they won 100% of the vote there, which they wouldn't.
You're kidding, right? Yeah, about 20%, so those two states alone would easily swing any election, despite the fact that they are only 1/25th of the states in the country. It would be a complete mob rule situation and they would indeed pretty much decide all the Presidential elections as the Democratic candidate wouldn't even need a 40% share of the rest of the states. This isn't that difficult to understand. Unless you're implying that the candidate that won those states would get no votes anywhere else, which is pretty silly. I don't think the majority of the country (which includes independents) would want CA and NY deciding elections.

Please stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2019, 01:08 AM
 
1,877 posts, read 677,685 times
Reputation: 1072
If the candidate is getting votes all over the country then it isn't just being decided by CA and NY, it's getting decided by the whole country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 01:14 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,619 posts, read 9,449,501 times
Reputation: 22954
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnM258 View Post
NY + CA is what, not even 20% of the US electorate? There's no way any candidate could ever win based on support just in those two states, even if they won 100% of the vote there, which they wouldn't.
NY + CA + TX + FL

There, fixed it for you. Those states would decide every election. No thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 01:34 AM
 
1,203 posts, read 835,762 times
Reputation: 1391
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnM258 View Post
If the candidate is getting votes all over the country then it isn't just being decided by CA and NY, it's getting decided by the whole country.
Apparently you're not kidding. Wow, just scary that you can't understand that a handful of states would then decide an election and very little representation from the rest of the country.

Last edited by JJonesIII; 04-05-2019 at 01:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 01:36 AM
 
1,203 posts, read 835,762 times
Reputation: 1391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
NY + CA + TX + FL

There, fixed it for you. Those states would decide every election. No thanks.
It may not be worth it trying to explain this to him. Apparently he sees nothing wrong with this.

Last edited by JJonesIII; 04-05-2019 at 01:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 01:57 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,619 posts, read 9,449,501 times
Reputation: 22954
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJonesIII View Post
It may not be worth it trying to explain this to him. Apparently he sees nothing wrong with this.
Agreed, he doesn't understand why we have an electoral college.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 02:01 AM
 
1,877 posts, read 677,685 times
Reputation: 1072
Oh I understand, i just think it's an unfair system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 02:09 AM
 
1,203 posts, read 835,762 times
Reputation: 1391
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnM258 View Post
Oh I understand, i just think it's an unfair system.
Yes, because Mob rule and lack of representation for the majority of states is a better system. Ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 03:16 AM
 
1,877 posts, read 677,685 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
NY + CA + TX + FL

There, fixed it for you. Those states would decide every election. No thanks.
In that case the voters of those four states combined would have approximately 35% of total voters, the rest of the country would have 65%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2019, 03:18 AM
 
1,877 posts, read 677,685 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJonesIII View Post
Yes, because Mob rule and lack of representation for the majority of states is a better system. Ridiculous.
There would be no lack of representation, they would be represented in proportion to their population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top