Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2019, 03:16 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,532 posts, read 37,132,711 times
Reputation: 13999

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
OK, the Earth has been colder (Precambrian) when CO2 levels were 20 times higher.

Explain!
Do your own research...Trust no one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2019, 04:24 AM
 
24,401 posts, read 23,056,554 times
Reputation: 15000
Solar conditions drive weather patterns her eon earth. Followed by CO2 from volcanic activity and then by other factors, including mankind's burning of fossil fuels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 05:23 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,288,448 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
Solar conditions drive weather patterns her eon earth. Followed by CO2 from volcanic activity and then by other factors, including mankind's burning of fossil fuels.
To the tune of 100 million barrels per day, there are climatic consequences to such a course of action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 05:30 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,004,475 times
Reputation: 15559
OP what's your scientific qualifications?

From a practical stand point I can't understand anyone objecting to improving air and water quality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 06:48 AM
 
1,705 posts, read 537,958 times
Reputation: 1142
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
OP what's your scientific qualifications?

From a practical stand point I can't understand anyone objecting to improving air and water quality.

The main problem is they don´t want to pay for anything... Their soul goal in life is "me me me... and don´t F****g touch my money!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 07:30 AM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,096 posts, read 19,701,602 times
Reputation: 25612
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
I'm losing count...Is this climate myth #5?

The mid-century cooling appears to have been largely due to a high concentration of sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere, emitted by industrial activities and volcanic eruptions. Sulphate aerosols have a cooling effect on the climate because they scatter light from the Sun, reflecting its energy back out into space.

The clean air acts introduced in Europe and North America reduced emissions of sulphate aerosols. As levels fell in the atmosphere, their cooling effect was soon outweighed by the warming effect of the steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases.

https://www.newscientist.com/article...cause-warming/

https://www.beforetheflood.com/explo...climate-myths/
Just as I figured. Global warming was caused by the environmentalists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,532 posts, read 37,132,711 times
Reputation: 13999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
Solar conditions drive weather patterns her eon earth. Followed by CO2 from volcanic activity and then by other factors, including mankind's burning of fossil fuels.
Why are you posting this? Are you that out of touch?

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the world's volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 10:17 AM
 
13,602 posts, read 4,929,119 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post

Again, AGW is the oppostie of valid science, as it ignores the most basic concept of the scientific method. What other area of valid science has an equal amount of academic fraud, data manipulation, and statistical errors? If engineering was allowed such "lattitude", all the bridges, buildings, and transportation modes would fall down or blow up a week after construciton.
How would you know? You wouldn't know valid science if it walked up and bit you on the nose. Aren't you the one who doesn't understand why Mars is colder than Earth? Any area of science may have isolated instances of fraud or errors, but this is very minimal in climate science. Or perhaps you could share some examples?

BTW, I see that your distrust of technology is reflected not only in distrust of climate scientists but also distrust of spell-checker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 02:50 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,288,448 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
How would you know? You wouldn't know valid science if it walked up and bit you on the nose.
op is a a graduate of the Limbaugh university of climatology.A place where opinion becomes fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2019, 03:26 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,614,322 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
During and after WW2, economies kicked into high gear, with massive outputs of CO2. Yet temps fell from their highs in the 1930s.

If CO2 is the "driver" of climate, which did temps fall over this 35 year period?

The year 1936 recorded the hottest thermometer readings of any year in the last 5,000. However, these days NOAA reports only its “adjusted” temperatures, which always seem to go only higher. In fact, the first surge of human-emitted carbon dioxide after World War II should have produced the biggest surge of warming – if CO2 is the control factor. Instead temperatures went down from 1940 to 1975.
Why did an ice age occur thousands of years ago despite a growing human and animal population on earth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top