Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obstructive act (p. 60): Though “evidence shows” that Trump reached out to intelligence community leadership, that outreach was “not interpreted … as directives to improperly interfere with the investigation.” Mueller notes that Trump’s outreach to NSA Director Mike Rogers was “significant enough that Rogers thought it important to document the encounter in a written memorandum.”
Are you kidding me?
You and Team Mueller think it's a crime for the President to speak with the head of the NSA? You people are out of your minds!
None of the stuff you listed is anywhere close to a crime. The Mueller Report is full of mischaracterizations of the law, and people like you have no way of knowing better regarding most of it. But the notion that talking to the head of the NSA is illegal is so ridiculous that no one has an excuse for believing something that stupid.
Team Mueller is suggesting that the President can be prosecuted for doing his job. And that is wrong as a matter of law.
meh...people aren't going to read a 400 page report and they don't trust the media to be non-partisan. Dems better find a candidate to beat Trump, so far all they have is a cast of misfits.
Here is an interesting question for you, and anyone else that cares to answer.
Which source do you think best described the findings and conclusions of the Mueller report?
1. The four page summary to Congress by Attorney General Barr.
2. The 25 minute press conference held by Mr. Barr prior to release of the report.
3. The tweets and statements of President Donald Trump. or,
They don't have to. Pertinent parts of the report have been reprinted by various news and media outlets. Reading only a few pages of the report is really all that anyone who cares needs to know in order to form the opinion that the president is a crook. Meanwhile a lot of the country's politicians ARE in fact reading the entire report and that is why more and more of them are coming around to suggest that impeachment is a legit option.
Sure politicians will read it.
As for the rest of Americans, what remains to be seen is which side spins it the best.
Americans as a whole other than political junkies are not reading a 400 page report.
Why does it always have to be that anyone reading the report and drawing a rational conclusion is on the "left". Anyone who uses logic will come to the same conclusion. And that is why Trump's poll numbers are sagging. I can tell from the responses from his supporters here that they are pretty worried too.
You did not read the link that I quoted, did ya. <<<<<rhetorical BTW, just by the way you answered.....
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) sought to tamp down the notion of impeaching President Trump in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's report, indicating to Democrats ahead of a conference call later Monday that they have other options. House Democratic leaders are grappling with a caucus divided over how to proceed after Mueller found several instances of Trump potentially obstructing justice.
"While our views range from proceeding to investigate the findings of the Mueller report or proceeding directly to impeachment, we all firmly agree that we should proceed down a path of finding the truth. It is also important to know that the facts regarding holding the President accountable can be gained outside of impeachment hearings," Pelosi wrote in a letter to House Democrats.
"As we proceed to uncover the truth and present additional needed reforms to protect our democracy, we must show the American people we are proceeding free from passion or prejudice, strictly on the presentation of fact."
Pelosi was the Speaker from 2007-2010, until the Obama completed his first two years in office and the Tea Party midterms resulted in the Democrats losing a whopping 64 seats. Now that she has been given back the gavel, she knows from experience that it can be taken away very quickly indeed, if her party starts indulging themselves in another round of hysterical unhinged nuttery, leading up to the 2020 election.
She is smart to try to walk her party back from the ledge.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
