Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:33 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Insufficient evidence is just that—insufficient
Doesn’t mean a crime was not committed—-
Only that enough evidence wasn’t discovered to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt...

Exactly.....that's why they have "beyond a reasonable doubt".....you have to prove it....in this case they did not...


Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
And there are 12 investigatigations still chomping away on crimes that were discovered and hope to obtain enough evidence to convict

Great, what does that have to do with the russia collusion investigation?






Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Likely there are indictments that are sealed and lying in wait for Trump and his 3 oldest children and others

Not according to mueller or his spokes person....but maybe you can enlighten us on where you are getting your investigation....do tell.....with a link....





Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
I remind you that Eric Prince and Steve Brannon both spoke to Mueller’s investigators under a proffer agreement
You don’t do that if there is no evidence of wrongdoing on someone’s part...

Says who, you?



Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Barr himself admitted that the Trump campaign was in communication with the Russians—government and adjunct—
That they BOTH had the same goal—get Trump elected.

Yes getting dirt on your opponent is BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD.......................


And BS, what proof do you have?



Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
And apparently there is no “smoking gun” to prove they conspired at this point—.

So, you are basically admitting everything above is just total BS, yet you still posted it....





Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
How convenient Mueller cut his investigation short....

What info do you have of this? Be specific....


Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
But that evidence could still show up...especially since Trump and his kids haven’t been tried and found not guilty in court of law....there is always time as long as you don’t have to worry about double jeopardy...

Yes, yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssss...it could "still show up"...I could fart diamonds also....so could you also, if you tried hard enough....


No more indictments...from the russian collusion investigation...said mueller/spokes person....

 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:36 PM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
For all those who say a sitting president cannot be indicted, why could mueller say "he did this"?



Yet he still did not....


Trump colluded, and here is why and how...(figure it out)....
 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:46 PM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,597,200 times
Reputation: 2398
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
The reason the president wasn't charged is that he can't be indicted AND it's up to Congress and/or prosecution when he leaves office.
IF this is true, wouldnt there be sealed indictments?
 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:51 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleh View Post
IF this is true, wouldnt there be sealed indictments?
As long as the charges are within the statute of limitations, no. Even if it was sealed we won't know until it was unsealed. A good recent example Julian Assange.
 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:53 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,440,773 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleh View Post
IF this is true, wouldnt there be sealed indictments?
Maybe..…...maybe not...…..maybe...….maybe not

Or maybe a new AG will go back and override and old AG...…….not bloody likely

Maybe pigs will fly...…….

The ignorance of my fellow Americans is really starting to be rather depressing.

Seems our greatest threat is not the Russians after all.
 
Old 04-23-2019, 04:54 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,440,773 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
As long as the charges are within the statute of limitations, no. Even if it was sealed we won't know until it was unsealed. A good recent example Julian Assange.
Except we know because Mueller said so, that there are no further indictments sealed or otherwise?

How do you explain that?
 
Old 04-23-2019, 05:02 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Except we know because Mueller said so, that there are no further indictments sealed or otherwise?

How do you explain that?
Mueller left it open for prosecution when the president leaves office or for Congress to take action. What part of the Mueller report doesn't click with Trump supporters? DENY, DEFLECT, DELUSIONAL and repeat.

As for seal indictments, I was referring to other districts like SDNY and DC. There are many investigations open. Mueller opened 14 more investigations.

The president claims total and complete exoneration yet he doesn't want McGhan to testify and plans to fight the subpoena. Same with his taxes and financial records. It's more important than ever for the Kremlin president to be exposed. He is hiding many things. The total exoneration is a complete lie.
 
Old 04-23-2019, 05:20 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,440,773 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Mueller left it open for prosecution when the president leaves office or for Congress to take action. What part of the Mueller report doesn't click with Trump supporters? DENY, DEFLECT, DELUSIONAL and repeat.

As for seal indictments, I was referring to other districts like SDNY and DC. There are many investigations open. Mueller opened 14 more investigations.

The president claims total and complete exoneration yet he doesn't want McGhan to testify and plans to fight the subpoena. Same with his taxes and financial records. It's more important than ever for the Kremlin president to be exposed. He is hiding many things. The total exoneration is a complete lie.
Mueller didn't leave it open for when the President leaves office. And even if he had, the AG closed that door.

Sure, its over unless Congress wants to impeach. Never denied that. But, oh snap, you don't have the votes for that do you?

As for sealed indictments that may or may not exist elsewhere, you are in the wrong thread. This thread is about conspiracy with Russians regarding the election. In any case, there is no reason to believe those spin off investigations will yield anything more than this one did with regard to the President.

Who cares if McGhan testifies. He's already on record through his attorney that nothing Trump did was to obstruct the investigation.

Its over.....all you have is impeachment...….go for it.
 
Old 04-23-2019, 05:25 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Mueller didn't leave it open for when the President leaves office. And even if he had, the AG closed that door.

Sure, its over unless Congress wants to impeach. Never denied that. But, oh snap, you don't have the votes for that do you?

As for sealed indictments that may or may not exist elsewhere, you are in the wrong thread. This thread is about conspiracy with Russians regarding the election. In any case, there is no reason to believe those spin off investigations will yield anything more than this one did with regard to the President.

Who cares if McGhan testifies. He's already on record through his attorney that nothing Trump did was to obstruct the investigation.

Its over.....all you have is impeachment...….go for it.
Yes, he made it possible or he won't have stated that exact issue including footnotes in the report. The AG didn't close the door because if that's the case, obstruction would be off the table too. It's not. Barr lied multiple times about Mueller findings. People are disregarding Barr's summary.

I'm not in the wrong thread. Someone asked about a sealed indictment. It's the usual pattern of his supporters brushing off his corruption. That's why he has a 38% approval rating because the rest of the country cares.
https://twitter.com/TheLeadCNN/statu...87625877458944
 
Old 04-23-2019, 05:29 PM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,213,236 times
Reputation: 5466
cnn. enough said. they are slip sliding away...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top