Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:24 PM
 
46,200 posts, read 26,966,096 times
Reputation: 11082

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Why are all these people willing to put their decades-long career on the line for a low approval and obstructive president? it's unbelievable. Barr covering up for a corrupt president. We are correct not to trust his summary.

Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.89332582252e

Why do you continue to put up link that have "pay walls"?


And think about it, why would all these people put their decades-long career on the line for a president?


I removed low approval and obstructive, since it cannot be proven....no matter what you say or provide....


Next.

 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,591 posts, read 56,353,148 times
Reputation: 23297
Look, all ye naysayers, Mueller investigated and verified innumerable instances of Russian election interference and cooperation with the Trump campaign. Unpatriotic, sleazy, whatever you want to call it - Mueller determined it didn't rise to the legal standard of conspiracy. Therefore, Mueller could render a judgment. Once again, collusion is a misnomer and NOT what the SC investigated.

Mueller also identified at least ten areas of obstruction of justice - and would absolutely have charged Trump if OLC Memo and Congressional prerogative had not been considerations. His own people have told DOJ so.

So, to say this looks "bad" for the Democrats is absurd. You'd have to be a flat-earther not to believe otherwise.

This looks TERRIBLE for Barr. He absolutely mischaracterized - WATERED DOWN, DEVALUED, DIMINISHED - the findings of the Mueller report to please his master.

Mueller was insulted and angry. Thus, he wrote Barr.

The chickens are now coming home to roost.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,708,703 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Nope. Mueller said Barr’s summary was accurate . This is buried under the sensationalist headlines
At this stage....I'm not buying into that, the justice statement cherry picked a portion of their conversation and left out the rest of the conversation...politicians have been know to do this. Let's hear from Mueller.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:27 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,072,367 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
This is perfect timing, too. AG Barr is set to testify before the Senate in less than 24 hours.

He is going to be ripped to shreds by Dems. I expect Republicans to choose party over country per usual and defend Barr and/or praise him.
Still believing your little lie? Mueller said he believe Barr’s summary was accurate
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:28 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,072,367 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
Look, all ye naysayers, Mueller investigated and verified innumerable instances of Russian election interference and cooperation with the Trump campaign. Unpatriotic, sleazy, whatever you want to call it - Mueller determined it didn't rise to the level of conspiracy. Collusion is a misnomer and NOT what the SC investigated.

Mueller also identified at least ten areas of obstruction of justice - and would absolutely have charged Trump if OLC Memo and Congressional prerogative had not been considerations.

So, to say this looks "bad" for the Democrats is absurd. You have to be a flat-earther to believe otherwise.

This looks TERRIBLE for Barr. He absolutely mischaracterized - WATERED DOWN, DEVALUED, DIMINISHED - the findings of the Mueller report to please his master.

Mueller was insulted and angry. Thus, he wrote Barr.

The chickens are now coming home to roost.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SethAMand...-letter-but%2F
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Here
11,574 posts, read 13,918,459 times
Reputation: 6983
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
At this stage....I'm not buying into that, the justice statement cherry picked a portion of their conversation and left out the rest of the conversation...politicians have been know to do this. Let's hear from Mueller.
We got a Stage 5 Clinger! Hanging on for hopes of ANYTHING to change the fact the Mueller report was a tremendous dud for the foaming-at-the-mouth rabid branch of the Democratic Party.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,708,703 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
We got a Stage 5 Clinger! Hanging on for hopes of ANYTHING to change the fact the Mueller report was a tremendous dud for the foaming-at-the-mouth rabid branch of the Democratic Party.
No....not really.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:31 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,483,808 times
Reputation: 10096
And Barr published Mueller's report, for all to see.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,708,703 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
That’s not what he said.


This is from the article you are all gushing over moron!


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5cFzFmU...g&name=900x900
Again...not really buying into that, that is coming from Barr's Justice Dept. They could have cherry picked that part of the conversation...but a story like this dropping before Barr goes before congress...nope not buying it.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 06:33 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,072,367 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Again...not really buying into that, that is coming from Barr's Justice Dept. They could have cherry picked that part of the conversation...but a story like this dropping before Barr goes before congress...nope not buying it.


Yes very convenient is it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top