Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2019, 08:53 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/...97112824250373


the Washington post article says itself Mueller was only talking about media interpretation


it does not say Mueller found Barr's summary inaccurate

 
Old 04-30-2019, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/...97112824250373


the Washington post article says itself Mueller was only talking about media interpretation


it does not say Mueller found Barr's summary inaccurate
Well at least the official line from the Barr's Dept of Justice and only them.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 08:55 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
except in the Washington Post article it says Mueller found the summary to be not be inaccurate


so this hack Senator from Maryland can't read or is falling for clickbait media
Russia is that you? There is a video of Barr's testimony. Barr lied by omission. Barr lied knowing about Mueller's concerns of his conclusion.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
Mueller's letter was dated 3/27. Barr testified before Congress on 4/10 that he did not know whether Mueller agreed with his "summary" or not. Barr committed provable perjury, and Nadler just tweeted as much. Read it for yourself.

https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/s...78879178133504

Barr has his DOJ doing a wild dance trying to get out of the fire. He won't make it.
He lied his a** off. He has NO credibility now...he's gotta go!
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:02 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
He lied his a** off. He has NO credibility now...he's gotta go!


He’ll go when he is replaced by the next president. That’s the only time he is going
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:03 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Russia is that you? There is a video of Barr's testimony. Barr lied by omission. Barr lied knowing about Mueller's concerns of his conclusion.


What concerns? Again the article you are all referring to does not show any concerns Mueller has with Barr
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
He’ll go when he is replaced by the next president. That’s the only time he is going
Don't know this is pretty cut and dry.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:06 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,533,837 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
except in the Washington Post article it says Mueller found the summary to be not be inaccurate


so this hack Senator from Maryland can't read or is falling for clickbait media
"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis,"
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:08 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
What concerns? Again the article you are all referring to does not show any concerns Mueller has with Barr
Yes it does. So does Barr's misleading testimony after Mueller's private letter of concern.
Mueller's statement:
Quote:
The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”
Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.A day after Mueller sent his letter to Barr, the two men spoke by phone for about 15 minutes, according to law enforcement officials.

In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office’s work, according to Justice Department officials. Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russia’s election interference, the officials said. Barr has testified previously he did not know whether Mueller supported his conclusion on obstruction.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.a6ce116e28a7
https://twitter.com/ChrisVanHollen/s...11712672190464
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:10 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Yes it does. So does Barr's misleading testimony after Mueller's private letter of concern.
Mueller's statement:
The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.a6ce116e28a7

https://twitter.com/ChrisVanHollen/s...11712672190464
so the Washington Post has to double back in their own article since they themselves said Mueller did not find Barr's summary inaccurate
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top