Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
so the Washington Post has to double back in their own article since they themselves said Mueller did not find Barr's summary inaccurate
That was a statement from the Dept of Justice....not the Wash Post.....geeez

 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:16 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/...97112824250373


the Washington post article says itself Mueller was only talking about media interpretation


it does not say Mueller found Barr's summary inaccurate



They spun the spin, of the spin...


Par for the Democrats coarse.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,199 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
his letter is not out in the open


Where is the letter?

why didn't Mueller come out any time after March 27 if Barr was the one not being accurate?

Barr is toast? What are you talking about? Please tell me what fantasy you are living in? What is going to happen with Barr? Please your fantasies are not the same as reality.
The Senate Democrats reportedly have a copy that they intend to produce during Barr's testimony tomorrow. Stay tuned.

If for some reason that is not correct, rest assured that Mr. Mueller kept a copy, just in case, which he will be more than happy to provide.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:20 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,199 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
except in the Washington Post article it says Mueller found the summary to be not be inaccurate


so this hack Senator from Maryland can't read or is falling for clickbait media
I thought WaPo was "fake news"...
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:21 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
That was a statement from the Dept of Justice....not the Wash Post.....geeez
wrong, the statement came later. The original article also admits that Mueller felt Barr's summary was not inaccurate
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,199 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14904
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
He’ll go when he is replaced by the next president. That’s the only time he is going
You might see a new president this Summer.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:23 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,436,942 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frihed89 View Post
Look, a Republican Senate is not going to try the President, even if the House sends it a bill of impeachment, which is unlikely. The best thing that the Democrats can do, now, is nominate a moderate, who will attract disaffected Republican voters and run with a moderate woman VP candidate who will appeal to suburban women...instead of committing political suicide, which might well appeal to radical Democrats.
Republicans do sentance republicans. See Nixon.....however, this group has a lot of the same Russian hook ups that they want to stay buried. Not to mention the common Lolita express.....
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:24 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
You might see a new president this Summer.
nice fantasy you got there. But dreams and fantasies sometimes will never come true, no matter how much you wish it
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:29 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,422,948 times
Reputation: 6409
This is the only thing I could find in the report about the media:
Quote:
In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office’s work, according to Justice Department officials. Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russia’s election interference, the officials said. Barr has testified previously he did not know whether Mueller supported his conclusion on obstruction. When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.
In their call, Barr also took issue with Mueller calling his memo a “summary,” saying he had never intended to summarize the voluminous report, but instead provide an account of its top conclusions, officials said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.f1ca0a06d991

But that could mean Mueller wasn't satisfied with one media network claiming total exoneration and another claiming to lock him up on obstruction. Mueller may have felt that the summary wasn't clear in reporting the findings to the media. While Barr's summary is not a lie, he omitted the key findings, spun the summary to suggest that Mueller didn't consider OLC guidelines of not indicting a sitting president when Mueller did consider the guideline. Mueller clearly left it to Congress to handle the corrupt president since he wrote in the report that no one is above the law.
 
Old 04-30-2019, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,728,246 times
Reputation: 3387
Mueller memorializing his views in a letter seems to be getting alot of attention from former G-Men

https://twitter.com/harrylitman/stat...30082280747008

Hmmm...who are people going to believe Mueller or Barr if indeed they are now....at war.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top