Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Only the president's supporters are failing for the angry democrat line. We know that most of the investigations were opened, investigated and assigned by Republicans. Democrats and Republicans are calling out a corrupt president that didn't contact the FBI regarding contacts and meetings with Russia. He chooses to lie over and over again. No one is entertaining the but...Hillary and Obama claim.
AND nobody is balking at the extent the Russians interfered in our election. I mean My God we should all be united on at least this.
Why is this ok to have investigation information that does not lead to prosecution being in the public sphere? It wasn't right when Comey did it and it is not right today.
Congress is not the "public sphere"
Congress --or select members--should see 97% probably of the report
Rachel Maddow tonight has good analysis of what the "code" of Mueller's language not redacted reveals if you simply pay attention
I missed it. I'm watching crazy Giuliani on Cuomo. Cuomo keeps pressing him to admit the president lies. It's entertaining to watch the president's supporters TRY to defend the indefensible. They can't!
judging from the mess this has turned into that was poor judgement on Barr's part and his motive was as transparent as wet t-shirt contest.
so if Barr stays quiet, Mueller's investigation on its own would have cleared your doubts?
What part of no collusion and no conspiracy you don't get? what part that Mueller on obstruction didn't find a crime but also couldn't exonerate the President you don't get?.......the confusion is from Mueller, not Barr.
It's like saying I didn't find evidence to indict you of stealing my car but I couldn't exonerate you either and leave it like that. Is that how prosecutors act? that you have to prove your innocence? As I said before , Mueller has to explain that cr@p under oath in Congress and get cross-examined by lawyers in the Senate.
Barr is not afraid to go up to Congress to answer questions about his conclusions of the law and the constitution, he is solid.......My money is Mueller will not come out well.
AND nobody is balking at the extent the Russians interfered in our election. I mean My God we should all be united on at least this.
i''ll balk. exactly what did they do except for buying some facebook ads? the "cyber hacking" of the DNC computers was done on a thumbdrive not over the internet. I mean... what is it that they really did that we have proof of that is not being fed to us by the intelligence community that won't let us see it?
The public has a redacted version and should have none. Comey should have never opened his mouth in July 2016.
I agree. A prosecutor either indicts or keep their mouth shut. "I didn't find evidence of a crime to prosecute but I didn't find evidence to exonerate" is B.S. and it was a political move by Mueller that he is going to get grilled by lawyers in the Senate and I hope he does.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.